udrafter
Champion sheet · Mid

Vex

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · All regions
Tournament presence · pick + ban
8.5%#87 of 173 champions
Pick
3.9%picked in 1,106 of 28,642 games
Ban
4.6%1,072 bans over 23,362 games, against 3.0% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid49.4% between 46.9% and 51.8% over 1,086 gamesSoloQ 51.7%: no clear gap
Median length29.3 minsoloQ 27.3 min

Amateur: 28,642 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 894,455 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    1.9%
    SoloQ
    1.4%
    1.9% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.4% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    4.8%
    SoloQ
    3.0%
    4.8% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 3.0% in soloQ over 361,874 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.3 min
    SoloQ
    27.3 min
    Median of 29.3 min in amateur play, against 27.3 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Electrocute, then Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesElectrocute82% · 22,349
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite75% · 20,298
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 99% · 150 games
Core (3 legendaries)31% · 3,259
31%of soloQ games
  1. Luden's Echo
  2. Shadowflame
  3. Zhonya's Hourglass
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 81% of mid laners.

  1. Crowd control (CC)top19%1.1 · mid laners: 0.7
  2. Map pressuretop20%4.1 · mid laners: 3.2

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • Map pressure
  • CC

Like other mid laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 74 in lane, 74 in mid game and 70 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

574+46 vs 528
964+65 vs 899
1,271+92 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Vexmid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 67% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
4.1takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 74 of 100 among mid laners574 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 74 of 100 among mid laners964 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 70 of 100 among mid laners1,271 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 40 of 100 among mid laners-52 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 33 of 100 among mid laners-171 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 80 of 100 among mid laners4.1 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 45 of 100 among mid laners457 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 63 of 100 among mid laners56% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 47 of 100 among mid laners22% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 42 of 100 among mid lanersrank 42 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 81 of 100 among mid laners1.1 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 73 of 100 among mid laners24% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against LeBlanc in amateur play: +12.5 pts over 109 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ambessa58.1% · expected 48.9% · 43 g+9.2 ptSoloQ +4.4
Renekton55.8% · expected 47.9% · 43 g+7.9 ptSoloQ -1.5
Ornn52.0% · expected 49.0% · 50 g+3.0 ptSoloQ -0.1
K'Sante54.3% · expected 51.5% · 46 g+2.9 ptSoloQ +3.4
Sion50.0% · expected 49.9% · 40 g+0.1 ptSoloQ -3.7
Junglegap to expected
Sejuani70.0% · expected 52.0% · 30 g+18.0 ptSoloQ -2.8
Lee Sin52.6% · expected 49.7% · 95 g+3.0 ptSoloQ -0.3
Vi52.5% · expected 49.2% · 80 g+3.3 ptSoloQ +6.7
Viego55.9% · expected 50.3% · 34 g+5.6 ptSoloQ +0.3
Sylas48.5% · expected 48.2% · 68 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +1.7
Midgap to expected
LeBlanc61.5% · expected 49.0% · 109 g+12.5 ptSoloQ +3.3
Ahri56.4% · expected 47.4% · 78 g+9.0 ptSoloQ -0.5
Sylas54.3% · expected 49.7% · 81 g+4.6 ptSoloQ +4.4
Syndra54.4% · expected 48.6% · 57 g+5.8 ptSoloQ -1.7
Lissandra56.7% · expected 50.7% · 30 g+6.0 ptSoloQ +7.7
ADCgap to expected
Jhin59.4% · expected 51.7% · 69 g+7.8 ptSoloQ -2.1
Caitlyn53.8% · expected 47.5% · 93 g+6.3 ptSoloQ +0.9
Jinx53.2% · expected 47.4% · 79 g+5.8 ptSoloQ +0.5
Xayah53.6% · expected 48.0% · 69 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +0.4
Kai'Sa53.3% · expected 49.9% · 92 g+3.4 ptSoloQ -1.1
Supportgap to expected
Milio64.8% · expected 51.2% · 54 g+13.6 ptSoloQ -0.7
Thresh60.6% · expected 48.2% · 71 g+12.4 ptSoloQ -0.2
Rakan56.7% · expected 48.5% · 60 g+8.2 ptSoloQ +0.6
Seraphine53.6% · expected 48.1% · 56 g+5.5 ptSoloQ +2.4
Rell51.2% · expected 45.9% · 43 g+5.3 ptSoloQ +2.2

With

Topgap to expected
Yone58.8% · expected 48.9% · 34 g+9.9 ptSoloQ -0.7
Jax56.7% · expected 49.9% · 30 g+6.8 ptSoloQ -0.8
Nasus55.6% · expected 50.5% · 36 g+5.1 ptSoloQ -3.1
Renekton53.2% · expected 50.8% · 47 g+2.3 ptSoloQ +2.8
Aatrox54.3% · expected 50.4% · 35 g+3.9 ptSoloQ -0.6
Junglegap to expected
Sylas57.1% · expected 50.5% · 49 g+6.7 ptSoloQ 0.0
Viego53.3% · expected 48.4% · 45 g+4.9 ptSoloQ +0.2
Wukong52.9% · expected 51.7% · 87 g+1.2 ptSoloQ -0.3
Nocturne47.8% · expected 46.8% · 46 g+1.0 ptSoloQ +0.4
ADCgap to expected
Miss Fortune63.9% · expected 48.7% · 36 g+15.2 ptSoloQ -1.8
Caitlyn59.1% · expected 51.2% · 93 g+7.9 ptSoloQ +1.2
Lucian55.9% · expected 48.5% · 68 g+7.4 ptSoloQ +1.5
Zeri61.1% · expected 52.3% · 36 g+8.8 ptSoloQ +1.9
Aphelios54.3% · expected 45.5% · 35 g+8.8 ptSoloQ +1.5
Supportgap to expected
Braum56.7% · expected 51.1% · 67 g+5.7 ptSoloQ -1.6
Nautilus51.5% · expected 49.6% · 97 g+1.9 ptSoloQ +1.6
Thresh53.2% · expected 50.5% · 79 g+2.6 ptSoloQ +2.7
Lulu48.9% · expected 47.0% · 92 g+1.9 ptSoloQ -0.2
Seraphine53.5% · expected 50.6% · 71 g+2.9 ptSoloQ -0.9

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top24 champions
  • Malphite56 games
    48.2%gap -1.5 ptsSoloQ: 46.9% · 870 g
  • Ornn50 games
    52.0%gap +3.0 ptsSoloQ: 50.7% · 511 g
  • K'Sante46 games
    54.3%gap +2.9 ptsSoloQ: 57.1% · 721 g
  • Ambessa43 games
    58.1%gap +9.2 ptsSoloQ: 57.5% · 663 g
  • Gnar43 games
    41.9%gap -9.0 ptsSoloQ: 54.3% · 534 g
Jungle21 champions
  • Lee Sin95 games
    52.6%gap +3.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 1,985 g
  • Wukong93 games
    44.1%gap -3.0 ptsSoloQ: 53.8% · 894 g
  • Vi80 games
    52.5%gap +3.3 ptsSoloQ: 60.1% · 607 g
  • Jarvan IV72 games
    44.4%gap -6.5 ptsSoloQ: 52.8% · 863 g
  • Sylas68 games
    48.5%gap +0.3 ptsSoloQ: 53.1% · 1,426 g
Mid19 champions
  • LeBlanc109 games
    61.5%gap +12.5 ptsSoloQ: 53.7% · 1,930 g
  • Sylas81 games
    54.3%gap +4.6 ptsSoloQ: 57.4% · 1,203 g
  • Ahri78 games
    56.4%gap +9.0 ptsSoloQ: 50.2% · 1,144 g
  • Syndra57 games
    54.4%gap +5.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.5% · 1,118 g
  • Aurora49 games
    38.8%gap -11.3 ptsSoloQ: 54.8% · 516 g
ADC18 champions
  • Yunara100 games
    49.0%gap +1.9 ptsSoloQ: 50.7% · 2,171 g
  • Caitlyn93 games
    53.8%gap +6.3 ptsSoloQ: 53.9% · 1,468 g
  • Kai'Sa92 games
    53.3%gap +3.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 2,405 g
  • Jinx79 games
    53.2%gap +5.8 ptsSoloQ: 50.7% · 1,760 g
  • Jhin69 games
    59.4%gap +7.8 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 2,493 g
Support17 champions
  • Lulu101 games
    51.5%gap -0.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.7% · 1,898 g
  • Nautilus98 games
    50.0%gap +0.9 ptsSoloQ: 53.3% · 1,646 g
  • Thresh71 games
    60.6%gap +12.4 ptsSoloQ: 49.2% · 1,953 g
  • Leona63 games
    46.0%gap -4.4 ptsSoloQ: 53.4% · 1,033 g
  • Braum60 games
    43.3%gap -4.3 ptsSoloQ: 49.6% · 898 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.4%24,274 picks of 1,788,900ban 3.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments1.9%727 picks of 38,304ban 4.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.1%2 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

7.6% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 3.2%G1231 games of 7,227
  • 3.7%G2270 games of 7,229
  • 3.7%G3+107 games of 2,878
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 231 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.