udrafter
Champion sheet · Mid

Syndra

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · All regions
Tournament presence · pick + ban
36.8%#4 of 173 champions
Pick
15.2%picked in 4,362 of 28,642 games
Ban
21.6%5,048 bans over 23,362 games, against 12.9% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid50.8% between 49.5% and 52.1% over 4,023 gamesSoloQ 50.5%: no clear gap
Median length29.3 minsoloQ 27.6 min

Amateur: 28,642 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 894,455 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    7.2%
    SoloQ
    4.5%
    7.2% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 4.5% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    21.4%
    SoloQ
    12.9%
    21.4% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 12.9% in soloQ over 361,874 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.3 min
    SoloQ
    27.6 min
    Median of 29.3 min in amateur play, against 27.6 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Arcane Comet, then Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, and Rabadon's Deathcap: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesArcane Comet59% · 52,977
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport84% · 75,370
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 666 games
Core (3 legendaries)11% · 3,848
11%of soloQ games
  1. Luden's Echo
  2. Shadowflame
  3. Rabadon's Deathcap
Amateur: Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, Zhonya's Hourglass (9%), gap not settled

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 94% of mid laners.

  1. Crowd control (CC)top6%1.4 · mid laners: 0.7
  2. Team damagetop13%25% · mid laners: 21%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • CC
  • Damage
  • Poke

Like other mid laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Map pressure
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills

What it is not

  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 38 in lane, 43 in mid game and 53 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

514-14 vs 528
876-24 vs 899
1,186+8 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Syndramid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 60% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
3.1takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 38 of 100 among mid laners514 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 43 of 100 among mid laners876 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 53 of 100 among mid laners1,186 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 68 of 100 among mid laners+154 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 60 of 100 among mid laners+183 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 46 of 100 among mid laners3.1 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 10 of 100 among mid laners292 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 46 of 100 among mid laners55% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 38 of 100 among mid laners21% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 53 of 100 among mid lanersrank 53 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 94 of 100 among mid laners1.4 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 88 of 100 among mid laners25% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Xin Zhao in amateur play: +9.1 pts over 257 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ambessa56.7% · expected 50.3% · 217 g+6.4 ptSoloQ -0.8
Mordekaiser58.3% · expected 50.0% · 108 g+8.3 ptSoloQ +0.9
Camille53.7% · expected 48.0% · 108 g+5.7 ptSoloQ -2.1
Dr. Mundo58.3% · expected 53.5% · 120 g+4.8 ptSoloQ -2.4
Fiora58.2% · expected 50.2% · 55 g+8.0 ptSoloQ -0.9
Junglegap to expected
Xin Zhao60.3% · expected 51.2% · 257 g+9.1 ptSoloQ -0.6
Graves58.9% · expected 50.7% · 73 g+8.2 ptSoloQ +2.4
Lillia52.8% · expected 47.5% · 108 g+5.2 ptSoloQ +2.0
Nocturne57.6% · expected 53.3% · 132 g+4.2 ptSoloQ -3.6
Pantheon58.6% · expected 54.5% · 87 g+4.2 ptSoloQ -1.6
Midgap to expected
Ryze64.0% · expected 52.3% · 100 g+11.7 ptSoloQ +0.4
Cassiopeia59.5% · expected 48.3% · 74 g+11.2 ptSoloQ +1.9
Hwei54.4% · expected 49.5% · 171 g+4.9 ptSoloQ +3.6
Akali55.0% · expected 50.5% · 120 g+4.5 ptSoloQ +0.4
Ahri50.0% · expected 48.9% · 356 g+1.1 ptSoloQ +0.4
ADCgap to expected
Lucian56.0% · expected 51.7% · 200 g+4.3 ptSoloQ -0.7
Xayah53.7% · expected 49.4% · 201 g+4.3 ptSoloQ +1.3
Sivir56.5% · expected 51.9% · 168 g+4.7 ptSoloQ -0.8
Kai'Sa53.5% · expected 51.3% · 301 g+2.2 ptSoloQ 0.0
Yunara49.6% · expected 48.5% · 391 g+1.1 ptSoloQ +0.5
Supportgap to expected
Alistar55.8% · expected 49.7% · 154 g+6.2 ptSoloQ +1.8
Braum51.8% · expected 49.1% · 301 g+2.7 ptSoloQ -0.6
Karma56.2% · expected 53.4% · 226 g+2.8 ptSoloQ -0.2
Nami59.7% · expected 53.9% · 72 g+5.9 ptSoloQ -0.3
Bard50.7% · expected 48.0% · 138 g+2.8 ptSoloQ +0.1

With

Topgap to expected
Ornn55.3% · expected 51.1% · 295 g+4.1 ptSoloQ +1.8
Gnar54.7% · expected 49.3% · 159 g+5.4 ptSoloQ +0.4
Dr. Mundo54.2% · expected 48.0% · 118 g+6.2 ptSoloQ -0.8
Renekton55.3% · expected 52.3% · 226 g+3.0 ptSoloQ -0.6
Fiora60.0% · expected 51.4% · 50 g+8.6 ptSoloQ +2.0
Junglegap to expected
Jarvan IV52.5% · expected 49.2% · 322 g+3.3 ptSoloQ +1.0
Nocturne54.2% · expected 48.2% · 120 g+5.9 ptSoloQ +1.1
Skarner54.1% · expected 48.3% · 109 g+5.9 ptSoloQ -0.8
Viego54.5% · expected 49.8% · 121 g+4.7 ptSoloQ +1.9
Lee Sin52.2% · expected 50.5% · 289 g+1.8 ptSoloQ +0.2
ADCgap to expected
Lucian56.3% · expected 49.9% · 245 g+6.4 ptSoloQ +1.3
Sivir54.8% · expected 49.7% · 186 g+5.1 ptSoloQ -0.3
Tristana54.3% · expected 50.8% · 219 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +0.7
Jinx55.6% · expected 52.7% · 288 g+2.8 ptSoloQ +0.2
Ezreal49.5% · expected 47.5% · 295 g+1.9 ptSoloQ -0.9
Supportgap to expected
Nautilus53.3% · expected 51.1% · 424 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +1.0
Milio51.6% · expected 48.9% · 252 g+2.7 ptSoloQ +1.9
Yuumi57.8% · expected 51.8% · 90 g+5.9 ptSoloQ +1.4
Blitzcrank56.2% · expected 52.8% · 162 g+3.4 ptSoloQ -0.5
Lulu48.6% · expected 48.4% · 403 g+0.2 ptSoloQ +0.4

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top28 champions
  • Ornn270 games
    47.4%gap -3.0 ptsSoloQ: 48.1% · 1,877 g
  • K'Sante240 games
    54.2%gap +1.3 ptsSoloQ: 54.1% · 2,480 g
  • Ambessa217 games
    56.7%gap +6.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 2,512 g
  • Sion216 games
    48.1%gap -3.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 1,649 g
  • Renekton176 games
    47.7%gap -1.6 ptsSoloQ: 51.7% · 2,468 g
Jungle22 champions
  • Wukong500 games
    46.8%gap -1.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.9% · 3,157 g
  • Jarvan IV328 games
    49.4%gap -2.9 ptsSoloQ: 51.7% · 2,977 g
  • Lee Sin297 games
    51.2%gap +0.1 ptsSoloQ: 51.2% · 6,934 g
  • Xin Zhao257 games
    60.3%gap +9.1 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 1,335 g
  • Vi240 games
    45.8%gap -4.8 ptsSoloQ: 52.8% · 1,744 g
Mid20 champions
  • Viktor464 games
    48.9%gap -1.4 ptsSoloQ: 52.0% · 6,315 g
  • Ahri356 games
    50.0%gap +1.1 ptsSoloQ: 49.9% · 4,723 g
  • Orianna278 games
    53.2%gap +0.5 ptsSoloQ: 53.7% · 2,529 g
  • Locke231 games
    51.1%gap 0.0 ptsSoloQ: 46.4% · 3,926 g
  • Hwei171 games
    54.4%gap +4.9 ptsSoloQ: 53.6% · 2,205 g
ADC17 champions
  • Yunara391 games
    49.6%gap +1.1 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 7,281 g
  • Caitlyn344 games
    48.0%gap -1.0 ptsSoloQ: 53.1% · 4,857 g
  • Jinx319 games
    48.3%gap -0.6 ptsSoloQ: 48.7% · 5,960 g
  • Kai'Sa301 games
    53.5%gap +2.2 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 7,485 g
  • Ezreal296 games
    55.1%gap +1.1 ptsSoloQ: 52.9% · 4,926 g
Support18 champions
  • Lulu437 games
    52.4%gap -0.7 ptsSoloQ: 52.8% · 6,853 g
  • Nautilus388 games
    49.2%gap -1.3 ptsSoloQ: 51.3% · 5,468 g
  • Braum301 games
    51.8%gap +2.7 ptsSoloQ: 48.0% · 2,978 g
  • Leona271 games
    46.5%gap -5.4 ptsSoloQ: 48.8% · 3,629 g
  • Milio230 games
    53.5%gap +0.8 ptsSoloQ: 53.1% · 2,426 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Priority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+4.5%81,374 picks of 1,788,900ban 12.9% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments7.2%2,764 picks of 38,304ban 21.4% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro10.8%240 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

37.7% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 19.2%G11,389 games of 7,227
  • 11.8%G2850 games of 7,229
  • 9.7%G3+279 games of 2,878
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 1,389 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.