udrafter
Champion sheet · Top

Yorick

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · All regions
Tournament presence · pick + ban
9.4%#86 of 173 champions
Pick
3.3%picked in 929 of 28,455 games
Ban
6.1%1,414 bans over 23,184 games, against 3.7% in soloQ
Win rate as Top52.8% between 50.0% and 55.5% over 881 gamesSoloQ 48.5%: clear gap
Median length29.3 minsoloQ 27 min

Amateur: 28,642 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 897,301 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • Win rateWins more in amateur play
    Amateur
    52.8%
    SoloQ
    48.5%
    52.8% win rate in amateur play over 881 games, against 48.5% in soloQ over 21,584 games.
  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    1.4%
    SoloQ
    1.1%
    1.4% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.1% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    5.9%
    SoloQ
    3.7%
    5.9% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 3.7% in soloQ over 364,710 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.3 min
    SoloQ
    27 min
    Median of 29.3 min in amateur play, against 27 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Grasp of the Undying, then Trinity Force, Spear of Shojin, and Serylda's Grudge: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesGrasp of the Undying47% · 10,239
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport55% · 11,755
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 94% · 110 games
Core (3 legendaries)5% · 425
5%of soloQ games
  1. Trinity Force
  2. Spear of Shojin
  3. Serylda's Grudge
Amateur: Trinity Force, Black Cleaver, Spear of Shojin (7%), gap not settled

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 89% of top laners.

  1. Team damagetop11%25% · top laners: 20%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Damage
  • Poke
  • Split-push

Like other top laners

  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Absorbs damage
  • Takes its kills in duels

What it is not

  • Few teamfights
  • Little CC

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 96 in lane, 88 in mid game and 55 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

692+93 vs 599
967+99 vs 868
1,084+5 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Yoricktop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 70% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 96 of 100 among top laners692 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 88 of 100 among top laners967 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 55 of 100 among top laners1,084 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 66 of 100 among top laners+211 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 70 of 100 among top laners+350 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 47 of 100 among top laners890 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 17 of 100 among top laners50% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 71 of 100 among top laners31% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 75 of 100 among top lanersrank 75 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 13 of 100 among top laners0.3 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 89 of 100 among top laners25% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Sivir in amateur play: +20.2 pts over 31 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Renekton60.0% · expected 51.2% · 35 g+8.8 ptSoloQ +2.3
Jax58.1% · expected 52.2% · 31 g+5.8 ptSoloQ -2.8
Nasus54.2% · expected 51.8% · 48 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -2.3
Irelia57.9% · expected 54.5% · 38 g+3.4 ptSoloQ -0.7
Sion54.3% · expected 53.4% · 46 g+1.0 ptSoloQ -6.8
Junglegap to expected
Sejuani67.6% · expected 55.3% · 37 g+12.3 ptSoloQ -2.1
Xin Zhao55.3% · expected 53.1% · 38 g+2.1 ptSoloQ -4.6
Viego54.3% · expected 53.7% · 35 g+0.5 ptSoloQ 0.0
Midgap to expected
Sylas62.9% · expected 53.0% · 35 g+9.8 ptSoloQ -0.6
Viktor56.8% · expected 52.4% · 74 g+4.4 ptSoloQ +0.9
Orianna60.5% · expected 54.8% · 38 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +0.4
ADCgap to expected
Sivir74.2% · expected 54.0% · 31 g+20.2 ptSoloQ -0.1
Aphelios68.8% · expected 56.5% · 32 g+12.3 ptSoloQ -1.5
Jhin61.4% · expected 55.1% · 70 g+6.4 ptSoloQ +1.5
Ashe61.1% · expected 51.5% · 36 g+9.6 ptSoloQ -2.2
Caitlyn54.4% · expected 50.9% · 79 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +1.3
Supportgap to expected
Milio72.2% · expected 54.6% · 36 g+17.6 ptSoloQ +3.6
Nautilus54.3% · expected 52.6% · 81 g+1.7 ptSoloQ +1.0
Seraphine56.8% · expected 51.6% · 37 g+5.2 ptSoloQ -2.5
Rell54.1% · expected 49.2% · 37 g+4.9 ptSoloQ -2.4
Leona55.9% · expected 53.8% · 59 g+2.1 ptSoloQ +1.1

With

Junglegap to expected
Lee Sin56.1% · expected 52.5% · 66 g+3.5 ptSoloQ -0.5
Vi55.6% · expected 52.9% · 63 g+2.6 ptSoloQ -2.8
Jarvan IV51.5% · expected 51.3% · 66 g+0.2 ptSoloQ -0.9
Xin Zhao54.8% · expected 52.4% · 42 g+2.3 ptSoloQ -1.6
Midgap to expected
Lissandra68.8% · expected 51.5% · 32 g+17.3 ptSoloQ -1.6
Ahri60.4% · expected 54.7% · 48 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +0.8
Viktor54.4% · expected 53.2% · 57 g+1.2 ptSoloQ -1.4
Orianna52.4% · expected 50.7% · 42 g+1.6 ptSoloQ +4.0
Sylas54.5% · expected 52.6% · 33 g+2.0 ptSoloQ -2.4
ADCgap to expected
Ezreal57.4% · expected 49.4% · 68 g+7.9 ptSoloQ +1.0
Caitlyn58.5% · expected 54.6% · 82 g+3.9 ptSoloQ +0.6
Xayah59.6% · expected 54.1% · 57 g+5.5 ptSoloQ -2.7
Yunara58.2% · expected 55.0% · 91 g+3.2 ptSoloQ -1.2
Jhin52.9% · expected 50.5% · 70 g+2.4 ptSoloQ +0.7
Supportgap to expected
Leona62.3% · expected 51.7% · 61 g+10.5 ptSoloQ +2.1
Thresh62.1% · expected 53.9% · 66 g+8.2 ptSoloQ -0.1
Milio60.0% · expected 50.9% · 40 g+9.1 ptSoloQ -0.6
Lulu55.0% · expected 50.4% · 80 g+4.6 ptSoloQ 0.0
Karma60.0% · expected 50.2% · 30 g+9.8 ptSoloQ 0.0

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top19 champions
  • Nasus48 games
    54.2%gap +2.4 ptsSoloQ: 46.3% · 484 g
  • Sion46 games
    54.3%gap +1.0 ptsSoloQ: 42.3% · 409 g
  • Yone45 games
    33.3%gap -20.0 ptsSoloQ: 42.7% · 963 g
  • K'Sante43 games
    55.8%gap +1.0 ptsSoloQ: 50.2% · 522 g
  • Ambessa38 games
    44.7%gap -7.6 ptsSoloQ: 46.0% · 426 g
Jungle21 champions
  • Jarvan IV75 games
    48.0%gap -6.3 ptsSoloQ: 49.4% · 778 g
  • Lee Sin74 games
    43.2%gap -9.8 ptsSoloQ: 48.2% · 1,617 g
  • Wukong71 games
    40.8%gap -9.6 ptsSoloQ: 46.0% · 729 g
  • Sylas55 games
    49.1%gap -2.7 ptsSoloQ: 47.5% · 770 g
  • Vi54 games
    46.3%gap -6.4 ptsSoloQ: 48.8% · 430 g
Mid21 champions
  • Viktor74 games
    56.8%gap +4.4 ptsSoloQ: 50.5% · 1,098 g
  • Ahri49 games
    46.9%gap -3.9 ptsSoloQ: 48.5% · 938 g
  • Syndra49 games
    38.8%gap -13.1 ptsSoloQ: 47.2% · 939 g
  • Orianna38 games
    60.5%gap +5.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.7% · 444 g
  • Sylas35 games
    62.9%gap +9.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 871 g
ADC17 champions
  • Caitlyn79 games
    54.4%gap +3.5 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 1,205 g
  • Jhin70 games
    61.4%gap +6.4 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 2,060 g
  • Ezreal66 games
    50.0%gap -6.1 ptsSoloQ: 53.0% · 1,197 g
  • Kai'Sa62 games
    48.4%gap -4.9 ptsSoloQ: 47.9% · 1,778 g
  • Yunara62 games
    37.1%gap -13.4 ptsSoloQ: 46.9% · 1,788 g
Support17 champions
  • Nautilus81 games
    54.3%gap +1.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 1,312 g
  • Lulu64 games
    53.1%gap -2.1 ptsSoloQ: 46.8% · 1,520 g
  • Thresh61 games
    44.3%gap -7.4 ptsSoloQ: 45.7% · 1,592 g
  • Leona59 games
    55.9%gap +2.1 ptsSoloQ: 48.1% · 860 g
  • Braum56 games
    46.4%gap -4.7 ptsSoloQ: 43.5% · 676 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.1%19,218 picks of 1,794,583ban 3.7% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments1.4%553 picks of 38,304ban 5.9% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro2.3%51 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

8.2% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 2.9%G1211 games of 7,187
  • 3.0%G2215 games of 7,193
  • 3.3%G3+94 games of 2,866
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 211 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.