Tournament presence · pick + ban
7.4%#97 of 173 champions
Pick
3.7%picked in 1,050 of 28,636 games
Ban
3.7%865 bans over 23,358 games, against 1.0% in soloQ
Win rate as Top48.1% between 45.5% and 50.8% over 952 gamesSoloQ 49.4%: no clear gap
Median length29.2 minsoloQ 27.7 min

Amateur: 28,642 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 894,455 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    3.3%
    SoloQ
    1.0%
    3.3% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 1.0% in soloQ over 361,874 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.2 min
    SoloQ
    27.7 min
    Median of 29.2 min in amateur play, against 27.7 min in soloQ.
  • BuildStridebreaker, Overlord's Bloodmail, Sterak's Gage instead of Stridebreaker, Black Cleaver, Overlord's Bloodmail
    Amateur
    22%
    SoloQ
    32%
    Played in 22% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Stridebreaker, Black Cleaver, Overlord's Bloodmail (32%).
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Conqueror, then Stridebreaker, Black Cleaver, and Overlord's Bloodmail: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesConqueror72% · 23,125
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite79% · 25,368
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 96% · 156 games
Core (3 legendaries)32% · 3,728
32%of soloQ games
  1. Stridebreaker
  2. Black Cleaver
  3. Overlord's Bloodmail
≠ Amateur: Stridebreaker, Overlord's Bloodmail, Sterak's Gage instead of Stridebreaker, Black Cleaver, Overlord's Bloodmail. 22% · 471 games

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

No trait above other top laners; the most marked: Damage in late game (rank 74).

  1. Its most marked traitDamage in late gametop26%1,152 · top laners: 1,079

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

Nothing above top laners.

Like other top laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Crowd control (CC)
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 30 in lane, 40 in mid game and 74 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

578-21 vs 599
843-25 vs 868
1,152+72 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Setttop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 60% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 30 of 100 among top laners578 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 40 of 100 among top laners843 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 74 of 100 among top laners1,152 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 42 of 100 among top laners+59 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 40 of 100 among top laners-8 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 70 of 100 among top laners1,149 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 46 of 100 among top laners53% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 67 of 100 among top laners30% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 44 of 100 among top lanersrank 44 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 68 of 100 among top laners1 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 74 of 100 among top laners23% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Lissandra in amateur play: +24.1 pts over 34 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ornn59.4% · expected 47.8% · 64 g+11.6 ptSoloQ -3.3
Aatrox57.9% · expected 47.1% · 38 g+10.8 ptSoloQ -1.0
Shen56.4% · expected 50.3% · 55 g+6.0 ptSoloQ +0.4
Malphite57.6% · expected 48.5% · 33 g+9.1 ptSoloQ -1.7
Renekton49.1% · expected 46.6% · 57 g+2.5 ptSoloQ -1.0
Junglegap to expected
Sylas62.5% · expected 47.0% · 40 g+15.5 ptSoloQ +1.8
Sejuani57.1% · expected 50.7% · 35 g+6.4 ptSoloQ +3.0
Lee Sin48.6% · expected 48.4% · 74 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +0.3
Vi49.1% · expected 47.9% · 55 g+1.2 ptSoloQ -1.9
Nocturne54.5% · expected 50.7% · 33 g+3.9 ptSoloQ -0.2
Midgap to expected
Lissandra73.5% · expected 49.4% · 34 g+24.1 ptSoloQ +0.7
Sylas63.9% · expected 48.4% · 36 g+15.4 ptSoloQ +1.0
Galio62.9% · expected 49.2% · 35 g+13.7 ptSoloQ +0.1
Syndra51.6% · expected 47.3% · 62 g+4.3 ptSoloQ +0.5
Hwei50.0% · expected 46.8% · 44 g+3.2 ptSoloQ +0.4
ADCgap to expected
Kai'Sa58.3% · expected 48.6% · 72 g+9.7 ptSoloQ +0.8
Jinx55.9% · expected 46.2% · 68 g+9.7 ptSoloQ -0.9
Ashe56.9% · expected 46.8% · 51 g+10.1 ptSoloQ -3.3
Miss Fortune58.1% · expected 48.8% · 31 g+9.3 ptSoloQ +3.7
Sivir55.3% · expected 49.2% · 38 g+6.1 ptSoloQ +0.9
Supportgap to expected
Nautilus62.1% · expected 47.8% · 95 g+14.3 ptSoloQ +0.2
Blitzcrank55.3% · expected 46.1% · 38 g+9.2 ptSoloQ +3.6
Seraphine53.6% · expected 46.9% · 56 g+6.7 ptSoloQ -0.9
Lulu55.1% · expected 50.5% · 78 g+4.7 ptSoloQ +0.4
Milio53.5% · expected 50.0% · 43 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +1.1

With

Junglegap to expected
Lillia71.9% · expected 51.4% · 32 g+20.5 ptSoloQ +2.5
Vi51.1% · expected 48.3% · 45 g+2.8 ptSoloQ -1.6
Xin Zhao50.0% · expected 47.7% · 46 g+2.3 ptSoloQ +0.1
Midgap to expected
Ahri57.6% · expected 50.0% · 59 g+7.6 ptSoloQ +2.5
Sylas56.5% · expected 47.8% · 46 g+8.7 ptSoloQ -1.2
Viktor55.1% · expected 48.6% · 69 g+6.5 ptSoloQ +0.8
Lissandra56.4% · expected 46.8% · 39 g+9.6 ptSoloQ +0.7
Syndra55.4% · expected 48.9% · 65 g+6.5 ptSoloQ +0.3
ADCgap to expected
Jinx64.1% · expected 50.0% · 64 g+14.0 ptSoloQ -0.1
Ezreal57.8% · expected 44.9% · 64 g+12.9 ptSoloQ -0.2
Yunara59.0% · expected 50.4% · 83 g+8.6 ptSoloQ +1.2
Lucian54.5% · expected 47.2% · 44 g+7.3 ptSoloQ -1.5
Miss Fortune47.7% · expected 47.4% · 44 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +2.3
Supportgap to expected
Karma57.5% · expected 45.5% · 40 g+12.0 ptSoloQ +0.3
Thresh55.6% · expected 49.3% · 63 g+6.3 ptSoloQ -1.4
Alistar58.3% · expected 49.2% · 36 g+9.1 ptSoloQ -1.7
Leona50.8% · expected 47.0% · 65 g+3.8 ptSoloQ +0.6
Blitzcrank57.6% · expected 50.1% · 33 g+7.4 ptSoloQ -0.7

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top20 champions
  • Sion70 games
    47.1%gap -1.5 ptsSoloQ: 54.7% · 567 g
  • Ornn64 games
    59.4%gap +11.6 ptsSoloQ: 45.1% · 791 g
  • K'Sante59 games
    39.0%gap -11.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.2% · 803 g
  • Renekton57 games
    49.1%gap +2.5 ptsSoloQ: 49.5% · 1,085 g
  • Shen55 games
    56.4%gap +6.0 ptsSoloQ: 48.5% · 749 g
Jungle21 champions
  • Jarvan IV75 games
    42.7%gap -7.0 ptsSoloQ: 49.7% · 1,122 g
  • Lee Sin74 games
    48.6%gap +0.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 2,025 g
  • Wukong60 games
    43.3%gap -2.5 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 1,192 g
  • Vi55 games
    49.1%gap +1.2 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 641 g
  • Xin Zhao47 games
    46.8%gap -1.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.8% · 404 g
Mid21 champions
  • Viktor66 games
    43.9%gap -3.7 ptsSoloQ: 51.3% · 1,418 g
  • Syndra62 games
    51.6%gap +4.3 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 1,445 g
  • Ahri58 games
    36.2%gap -10.0 ptsSoloQ: 49.9% · 1,466 g
  • Orianna56 games
    48.2%gap -1.8 ptsSoloQ: 54.4% · 603 g
  • Hwei44 games
    50.0%gap +3.2 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 680 g
ADC18 champions
  • Yunara92 games
    40.2%gap -5.6 ptsSoloQ: 48.4% · 2,534 g
  • Jhin80 games
    45.0%gap -5.4 ptsSoloQ: 49.2% · 2,888 g
  • Kai'Sa72 games
    58.3%gap +9.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 2,674 g
  • Caitlyn70 games
    40.0%gap -6.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 1,747 g
  • Jinx68 games
    55.9%gap +9.7 ptsSoloQ: 47.0% · 2,290 g
Support18 champions
  • Nautilus95 games
    62.1%gap +14.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 1,784 g
  • Lulu78 games
    55.1%gap +4.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.7% · 2,188 g
  • Thresh70 games
    44.3%gap -2.6 ptsSoloQ: 46.6% · 2,344 g
  • Braum62 games
    46.8%gap +0.4 ptsSoloQ: 48.9% · 1,106 g
  • Leona59 games
    39.0%gap -10.2 ptsSoloQ: 47.9% · 1,286 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.6%28,513 picks of 1,788,891ban 1.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments1.7%637 picks of 38,304ban 3.3% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.1%2 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

8.0% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 2.9%G1210 games of 7,227
  • 3.3%G2241 games of 7,228
  • 3.2%G3+91 games of 2,878
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 210 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.