Tournament presence · pick + ban
7.6%#95 of 173 champions
Pick
4.7%picked in 1,324 of 28,365 games
Ban
2.9%681 bans over 23,108 games, against 0.8% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid49.6% between 46.2% and 53.0% over 587 gamesSoloQ 50.4%: no clear gap
Median length29.6 minsoloQ 28.2 min

Amateur: 28,642 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 897,301 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftPicked less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    1.0%
    SoloQ
    1.1%
    1.0% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.1% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    2.8%
    SoloQ
    0.8%
    2.8% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 0.8% in soloQ over 364,710 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.6 min
    SoloQ
    28.2 min
    Median of 29.6 min in amateur play, against 28.2 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Arcane Comet, then Luden's Echo, Stormsurge, and Shadowflame: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesArcane Comet80% · 18,573
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport54% · 12,387
Same in amateur play
SkillsEnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 105 games
Core (3 legendaries)18% · 1,692
18%of soloQ games
  1. Luden's Echo
  2. Stormsurge
  3. Shadowflame
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 87% of mid laners.

  1. Crowd control (CC)top14%1.2 · mid laners: 0.7

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • CC

Like other mid laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Map pressure
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 36 in lane, 49 in mid game and 67 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

508-20 vs 528
891-8 vs 899
1,253+75 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Luxmid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 72% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
3.4takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 36 of 100 among mid laners508 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 49 of 100 among mid laners891 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 67 of 100 among mid laners1,253 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 37 of 100 among mid laners-79 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 28 of 100 among mid laners-218 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 54 of 100 among mid laners3.4 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 28 of 100 among mid laners363 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 43 of 100 among mid laners54% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 37 of 100 among mid laners20% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 67 of 100 among mid lanersrank 67 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 87 of 100 among mid laners1.2 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 65 of 100 among mid laners23% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Lee Sin in amateur play: +13.8 pts over 44 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ornn53.1% · expected 49.2% · 32 g+3.9 ptSoloQ -2.0
Junglegap to expected
Lee Sin63.6% · expected 49.8% · 44 g+13.8 ptSoloQ +1.3
Wukong53.8% · expected 47.2% · 52 g+6.7 ptSoloQ -0.5
Sylas53.1% · expected 48.7% · 32 g+4.5 ptSoloQ -0.1
Jarvan IV53.3% · expected 51.1% · 45 g+2.2 ptSoloQ -0.6
Midgap to expected
Orianna55.9% · expected 51.6% · 34 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +0.3
Ahri50.0% · expected 47.6% · 38 g+2.4 ptSoloQ +0.2
ADCgap to expected
Ashe60.6% · expected 48.2% · 33 g+12.4 ptSoloQ +0.5
Tristana57.5% · expected 49.6% · 40 g+7.9 ptSoloQ -0.2
Caitlyn48.3% · expected 47.8% · 58 g+0.5 ptSoloQ +2.0
Jinx50.0% · expected 47.6% · 38 g+2.4 ptSoloQ +0.8
Supportgap to expected
Blitzcrank56.8% · expected 47.8% · 37 g+9.0 ptSoloQ -3.0
Thresh54.8% · expected 48.3% · 31 g+6.5 ptSoloQ +1.7
Lulu55.6% · expected 52.0% · 45 g+3.6 ptSoloQ +1.2
Braum51.3% · expected 47.8% · 39 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +1.6

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected
Jarvan IV51.2% · expected 48.0% · 43 g+3.1 ptSoloQ +2.6
Vi50.0% · expected 49.7% · 36 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +2.4
ADCgap to expected
Jinx59.4% · expected 51.6% · 32 g+7.8 ptSoloQ -1.0
Xayah56.0% · expected 51.0% · 50 g+5.0 ptSoloQ -0.8
Lucian55.9% · expected 48.8% · 34 g+7.1 ptSoloQ -4.6
Yunara52.7% · expected 51.8% · 55 g+0.9 ptSoloQ +0.4
Jhin47.7% · expected 47.3% · 44 g+0.4 ptSoloQ -1.4
Supportgap to expected
Blitzcrank63.3% · expected 51.4% · 30 g+12.0 ptSoloQ -0.5
Thresh55.3% · expected 50.8% · 38 g+4.5 ptSoloQ -0.9
Milio53.1% · expected 47.7% · 32 g+5.4 ptSoloQ -0.9
Rakan54.5% · expected 50.6% · 33 g+3.9 ptSoloQ +0.5
Lulu48.0% · expected 47.2% · 50 g+0.8 ptSoloQ -1.6

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top22 champions
  • Ornn32 games
    53.1%gap +3.9 ptsSoloQ: 47.4% · 523 g
  • Renekton29 games
    —SoloQ: 53.4% · 627 g
  • K'Sante27 games
    —SoloQ: 51.7% · 516 g
  • Sion26 games
    —SoloQ: 53.2% · 395 g
  • Ambessa24 games
    —SoloQ: 50.2% · 601 g
Jungle19 champions
  • Wukong52 games
    53.8%gap +6.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.1% · 829 g
  • Jarvan IV45 games
    53.3%gap +2.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.9% · 875 g
  • Lee Sin44 games
    63.6%gap +13.8 ptsSoloQ: 52.0% · 1,492 g
  • Vi44 games
    40.9%gap -8.5 ptsSoloQ: 57.6% · 387 g
  • Xin Zhao35 games
    48.6%gap -1.3 ptsSoloQ: 52.5% · 257 g
Mid20 champions
  • Syndra62 games
    45.2%gap -3.5 ptsSoloQ: 51.4% · 1,341 g
  • Viktor59 games
    42.4%gap -6.8 ptsSoloQ: 51.0% · 1,301 g
  • Ahri38 games
    50.0%gap +2.4 ptsSoloQ: 49.6% · 1,239 g
  • Orianna34 games
    55.9%gap +4.2 ptsSoloQ: 52.4% · 498 g
  • Akali23 games
    —SoloQ: 52.7% · 607 g
ADC18 champions
  • Jhin61 games
    45.9%gap -5.9 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 2,204 g
  • Caitlyn58 games
    48.3%gap +0.5 ptsSoloQ: 53.7% · 1,317 g
  • Yunara47 games
    40.4%gap -6.9 ptsSoloQ: 50.7% · 1,891 g
  • Kai'Sa41 games
    39.0%gap -11.0 ptsSoloQ: 49.6% · 1,755 g
  • Tristana40 games
    57.5%gap +7.9 ptsSoloQ: 48.7% · 1,304 g
Support18 champions
  • Nautilus60 games
    48.3%gap -1.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 1,459 g
  • Leona48 games
    50.0%gap -0.6 ptsSoloQ: 48.1% · 926 g
  • Lulu45 games
    55.6%gap +3.6 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 1,639 g
  • Braum39 games
    51.3%gap +3.5 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 598 g
  • Blitzcrank37 games
    56.8%gap +9.0 ptsSoloQ: 45.8% · 1,099 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.1%20,443 picks of 1,794,592ban 0.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments1.0%387 picks of 38,304ban 2.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.1%2 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

7.3% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 1.9%G1138 games of 7,176
  • 2.3%G2165 games of 7,176
  • 1.9%G3+55 games of 2,850
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 138 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.