udrafter
Champion sheet · Support

Nautilus

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · All regions
Tournament presence · pick + ban
35.6%#5 of 173 champions
Pick
19.7%picked in 5,637 of 28,637 games
Ban
15.9%3,719 bans over 23,358 games, against 13.1% in soloQ
Win rate as Support50.3% between 49.2% and 51.4% over 5,552 gamesSoloQ 49.2%: no clear gap
Median length28.9 minsoloQ 26.8 min

Amateur: 28,642 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 894,455 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Support.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    9.8%
    SoloQ
    6.0%
    9.8% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 6.0% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    15.8%
    SoloQ
    13.1%
    15.8% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 13.1% in soloQ over 361,874 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.9 min
    SoloQ
    26.8 min
    Median of 28.9 min in amateur play, against 26.8 min in soloQ.
  • SpellsFlash + Heal instead of Flash + Ignite
    Amateur
    59%
    SoloQ
    56%
    Played in 59% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Flash + Ignite (56%).

Not enough games to judge: core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Aftershock, then Protoplasm Harness, Kaenic Rookern, and Frozen Heart: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesAftershock90% · 107,622
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite56% · 66,379
≠ Amateur: Flash + Heal instead of Flash + Ignite. 59% · 5,971 games
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 92% · 798 games
Core (3 legendaries)3% · 2
3%of soloQ games
  1. Protoplasm Harness
  2. Kaenic Rookern
  3. Frozen Heart

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Absorbs damage first: absorbs more than 97% of supports.

  1. Absorbs damagetop3%1,114 · supports: 393
  2. Crowd control (CC)top3%1.9 · supports: 1
  3. Plays teamfightstop12%57% · supports: 54%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other supports

What marks it

  • Frontline
  • Teamfight
  • CC

Like other supports

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Map pressure
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 42 in lane, 30 in mid game and 27 in late game, out of 100 supports.

255-33 vs 288
287-55 vs 342
317-71 vs 388
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Nautilussupports

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 85% of supports against the direct opponent.

supports
4.9takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; supports: 4.5.

Where it stands among supports · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 42 of 100 among supports255 · median 288
  • Damage in mid game · rank 30 of 100 among supports287 · median 342
  • Damage in late game · rank 27 of 100 among supports317 · median 388
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 24 of 100 among supports-80 · median +105
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 15 of 100 among supports-143 · median +193
  • Map pressure · rank 68 of 100 among supports4.9 · median 4.5
  • Absorbs damage · rank 97 of 100 among supports1,114 · median 393
  • Plays teamfights · rank 88 of 100 among supports57% · median 54%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 34 of 100 among supports15% · median 17%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 45 of 100 among supportsrank 45 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 97 of 100 among supports1.9 · median 1
  • Team damage · rank 32 of 100 among supports8% · median 9%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Zed in amateur play: +13.7 pts over 72 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ornn53.9% · expected 49.9% · 330 g+4.0 ptSoloQ +1.2
Nasus54.4% · expected 49.1% · 147 g+5.3 ptSoloQ +0.2
Ambessa52.4% · expected 49.8% · 271 g+2.6 ptSoloQ +0.9
Dr. Mundo55.7% · expected 53.0% · 176 g+2.7 ptSoloQ +0.6
Irelia61.0% · expected 52.0% · 41 g+9.0 ptSoloQ -1.3
Junglegap to expected
Jarvan IV58.8% · expected 51.8% · 359 g+7.0 ptSoloQ -2.7
Qiyana55.6% · expected 47.6% · 171 g+8.0 ptSoloQ +0.8
Wukong48.2% · expected 48.0% · 575 g+0.2 ptSoloQ -0.9
Lee Sin50.9% · expected 50.6% · 468 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +0.6
Kha'Zix53.6% · expected 49.8% · 97 g+3.9 ptSoloQ +2.0
Midgap to expected
Zed56.9% · expected 43.2% · 72 g+13.7 ptSoloQ +1.7
Lissandra55.7% · expected 51.6% · 185 g+4.1 ptSoloQ 0.0
Orianna54.3% · expected 52.2% · 276 g+2.1 ptSoloQ -2.2
Syndra50.8% · expected 49.5% · 388 g+1.3 ptSoloQ +0.1
LeBlanc53.5% · expected 49.9% · 155 g+3.6 ptSoloQ -0.2
ADCgap to expected
Aphelios61.2% · expected 54.1% · 196 g+7.1 ptSoloQ +1.4
Ezreal56.5% · expected 53.5% · 499 g+3.0 ptSoloQ +0.8
Jinx50.8% · expected 48.3% · 329 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -2.0
Jhin53.6% · expected 52.6% · 433 g+1.0 ptSoloQ +1.7
Caitlyn48.9% · expected 48.4% · 460 g+0.5 ptSoloQ +1.4
Supportgap to expected
Karma59.2% · expected 52.9% · 282 g+6.3 ptSoloQ +3.1
Blitzcrank54.3% · expected 48.3% · 138 g+6.1 ptSoloQ +0.7
Thresh52.4% · expected 49.1% · 332 g+3.3 ptSoloQ -0.9
Seraphine52.1% · expected 49.0% · 317 g+3.0 ptSoloQ -1.1
Poppy55.4% · expected 49.1% · 101 g+6.4 ptSoloQ +1.4

With

Topgap to expected
K'Sante54.2% · expected 48.1% · 262 g+6.1 ptSoloQ -0.5
Nasus58.4% · expected 51.4% · 154 g+7.0 ptSoloQ -0.3
Fiora61.0% · expected 50.9% · 59 g+10.1 ptSoloQ +0.8
Sion53.2% · expected 49.7% · 237 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +0.6
Gangplank61.7% · expected 53.7% · 60 g+8.0 ptSoloQ +0.7
Junglegap to expected
Qiyana56.9% · expected 52.9% · 197 g+3.9 ptSoloQ +0.1
Jarvan IV50.1% · expected 48.7% · 425 g+1.4 ptSoloQ +0.3
Wukong53.5% · expected 52.6% · 482 g+1.0 ptSoloQ -1.8
Viego49.5% · expected 49.3% · 222 g+0.2 ptSoloQ +0.1
Hecarim51.7% · expected 46.4% · 60 g+5.3 ptSoloQ +0.9
Midgap to expected
Akali55.2% · expected 50.5% · 165 g+4.6 ptSoloQ -1.2
Syndra53.3% · expected 51.1% · 424 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +1.0
Hwei54.7% · expected 51.5% · 201 g+3.2 ptSoloQ +1.1
Ahri52.6% · expected 52.2% · 397 g+0.5 ptSoloQ +1.2
Cassiopeia55.3% · expected 52.7% · 132 g+2.6 ptSoloQ -1.0
ADCgap to expected
Jinx55.8% · expected 52.2% · 283 g+3.6 ptSoloQ +0.6
Varus56.2% · expected 50.8% · 130 g+5.3 ptSoloQ -0.9
Ezreal50.2% · expected 47.0% · 269 g+3.2 ptSoloQ +0.9
Sivir53.2% · expected 49.2% · 188 g+4.0 ptSoloQ +0.1
Tristana52.5% · expected 50.3% · 316 g+2.2 ptSoloQ -0.6

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top28 champions
  • K'Sante330 games
    52.7%gap +0.3 ptsSoloQ: 51.2% · 3,746 g
  • Ornn330 games
    53.9%gap +4.0 ptsSoloQ: 49.4% · 2,136 g
  • Renekton275 games
    45.1%gap -3.7 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 3,470 g
  • Ambessa271 games
    52.4%gap +2.6 ptsSoloQ: 51.4% · 3,183 g
  • Sion239 games
    50.2%gap -0.6 ptsSoloQ: 49.4% · 1,975 g
Jungle23 champions
  • Wukong575 games
    48.2%gap +0.2 ptsSoloQ: 47.4% · 3,971 g
  • Lee Sin468 games
    50.9%gap +0.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.1% · 9,395 g
  • Jarvan IV359 games
    58.8%gap +7.0 ptsSoloQ: 47.5% · 3,718 g
  • Xin Zhao323 games
    43.7%gap -7.1 ptsSoloQ: 46.0% · 1,795 g
  • Vi315 games
    49.5%gap -0.5 ptsSoloQ: 52.1% · 2,484 g
Mid23 champions
  • Ahri425 games
    47.3%gap -1.1 ptsSoloQ: 49.0% · 5,286 g
  • Viktor394 games
    46.2%gap -3.6 ptsSoloQ: 49.1% · 5,572 g
  • Syndra388 games
    50.8%gap +1.3 ptsSoloQ: 48.7% · 5,468 g
  • Orianna276 games
    54.3%gap +2.1 ptsSoloQ: 48.7% · 2,474 g
  • Sylas250 games
    49.6%gap -1.0 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 5,291 g
ADC17 champions
  • Yunara609 games
    47.1%gap -0.9 ptsSoloQ: 46.7% · 10,046 g
  • Ezreal499 games
    56.5%gap +3.0 ptsSoloQ: 53.8% · 7,792 g
  • Caitlyn460 games
    48.9%gap +0.5 ptsSoloQ: 51.9% · 6,904 g
  • Jhin433 games
    53.6%gap +1.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.3% · 12,015 g
  • Lucian348 games
    48.0%gap -3.2 ptsSoloQ: 53.0% · 4,914 g
Support19 champions
  • Braum674 games
    45.8%gap -2.7 ptsSoloQ: 44.8% · 7,846 g
  • Lulu656 games
    51.8%gap -0.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.8% · 9,316 g
  • Leona435 games
    47.8%gap -3.5 ptsSoloQ: 45.0% · 5,612 g
  • Rell377 games
    44.8%gap -2.0 ptsSoloQ: 42.9% · 5,000 g
  • Thresh332 games
    52.4%gap +3.3 ptsSoloQ: 45.9% · 9,480 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Priority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.

Pick rate as Support

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+6.0%108,023 picks of 1,788,901ban 13.1% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments9.8%3,748 picks of 38,304ban 15.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro8.9%198 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

35.5% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Support
  • 20.8%G11,503 games of 7,227
  • 18.0%G21,304 games of 7,228
  • 15.5%G3+445 games of 2,878
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 1,503 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.