Champion sheet · Top

Kled

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · All regions

Tournament presence · pick + ban

3.3%#140 of 173 champions

Pick: 1.4%picked in 406 of 28,552 games
Ban: 1.9%443 bans over 23,278 games, against 0.8% in soloQ

Win rate as Top48.1% between 43.8% and 52.4% over 366 gamesSoloQ 50.9%: no clear gap

Median length28.6 minsoloQ 26.9 min

Amateur: 28,642 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 897,301 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.DraftLength
How to play itConqueror, then Titanic Hydra, Black Cleaver, and Overlord's Bloodmail: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compNo trait above other top laners; the most marked: Absorbs damage (rank 69).
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftTaken at any point of the series.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

DraftPicked less often in amateur play
Amateur
0.7%
SoloQ
1.1%
0.7% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.1% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
1.8%
SoloQ
0.8%
1.8% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 0.8% in soloQ over 364,710 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
28.6 min
SoloQ
26.9 min
Median of 28.6 min in amateur play, against 26.9 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Conqueror, then Titanic Hydra, Black Cleaver, and Overlord's Bloodmail: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesConqueror74% · 15,902

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Ignite68% · 14,614

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 100% · 68 games

Core (3 legendaries)11% · 941

11%of soloQ games

Titanic Hydra
Black Cleaver
Overlord's Bloodmail

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

No trait above other top laners; the most marked: Absorbs damage (rank 69).

Its most marked traitAbsorbs damagetop31%1,131 · top laners: 970

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

Nothing above top laners.

Like other top laners

Damage in lane
Damage in late game
Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Absorbs damage
Plays teamfights
Takes its kills in duels
Lets allies carry kills
Team damage

What it is not

Little CC
No poke
No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 56 in lane, 21 in mid game and 29 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

610+11 vs 599

815-53 vs 868

994-86 vs 1,079

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Kledtop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 56% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 56 of 100 among top laners610 · median 599
Damage in mid game · rank 21 of 100 among top laners815 · median 868
Damage in late game · rank 29 of 100 among top laners994 · median 1,079
Gold at 15 min · rank 55 of 100 among top laners+125 · median +119
Gold at 20 min · rank 44 of 100 among top laners+40 · median +100
Absorbs damage · rank 69 of 100 among top laners1,131 · median 970
Plays teamfights · rank 61 of 100 among top laners54% · median 53%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 34 of 100 among top laners26% · median 28%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 53 of 100 among top lanersrank 53 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 16 of 100 among top laners0.4 · median 0.8
Team damage · rank 57 of 100 among top laners22% · median 20%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Wukong51.2% · expected 45.8% · 41 g+5.5 ptSoloQ +0.9

Midgap to expected

Ahri53.1% · expected 46.1% · 32 g+7.0 ptSoloQ -0.6

ADCgap to expected

Jinx47.1% · expected 46.1% · 34 g+0.9 ptSoloQ +0.3

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

Syndra60.6% · expected 48.9% · 33 g+11.7 ptSoloQ +2.2

ADCgap to expected

Yunara54.1% · expected 50.4% · 37 g+3.7 ptSoloQ +1.8

Supportgap to expected

Lulu55.9% · expected 45.7% · 34 g+10.2 ptSoloQ -2.2

Nautilus51.4% · expected 48.3% · 37 g+3.0 ptSoloQ -3.2

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top17 champions