Champion sheet · ADC

Draven

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · All regions

Tournament presence · pick + ban

4.5%#125 of 173 champions

Pick: 1.6%picked in 468 of 28,522 games
Ban: 2.9%674 bans over 23,250 games, against 24.2% in soloQ

Win rate as ADC49.3% between 45.5% and 53.2% over 448 gamesSoloQ 51.6%: no clear gap

Median length28.6 minsoloQ 27 min

Amateur: 28,642 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 897,301 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.DraftLengthBuild
How to play itLethal Tempo, then Hubris, Hexoptics C44, and Infinity Edge: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compTakes its kills in duels first: more duels than 93% of ADC.Duelist
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftFallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.

DraftPicked less often in amateur play
Amateur
0.9%
SoloQ
2.7%
0.9% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 2.7% in soloQ.
DraftBanned less often in amateur play
Amateur
3.0%
SoloQ
24.2%
3.0% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 24.2% in soloQ over 364,710 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
28.6 min
SoloQ
27 min
Median of 28.6 min in amateur play, against 27 min in soloQ.
BuildBloodthirster, The Collector, Infinity Edge instead of Hubris, Hexoptics C44, Infinity Edge
Amateur
17%
SoloQ
14%
Played in 17% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Hubris, Hexoptics C44, Infinity Edge (14%).

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Lethal Tempo, then Hubris, Hexoptics C44, and Infinity Edge: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesLethal Tempo90% · 47,287

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Barrier70% · 37,108

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 100% · 69 games

Core (3 legendaries)14% · 4,452

14%of soloQ games

Hubris
Hexoptics C44
Infinity Edge

≠ Amateur: Bloodthirster, The Collector, Infinity Edge instead of Hubris, Hexoptics C44, Infinity Edge. 17% · 392 games

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Takes its kills in duels first: more duels than 93% of ADC.

Takes its kills in duelstop7%23% · ADC: 19%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other ADC

What marks it

Duelist

Like other ADC

Damage in lane
Lets allies carry kills
Crowd control (CC)
Team damage

What it is not

Few teamfights
No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 49 in lane, 1 in mid game and 1 in late game, out of 100 ADC.

5240 vs 525

723-192 vs 915

1,115-251 vs 1,366

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

DravenADC

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 100% of ADC against the direct opponent.

ADC

Where it stands among ADC · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 49 of 100 among ADC524 · median 525
Damage in mid game · rank 1 of 100 among ADC723 · median 915
Damage in late game · rank 1 of 100 among ADC1,115 · median 1,366
Gold at 15 min · rank 100 of 100 among ADC+801 · median -54
Gold at 20 min · rank 100 of 100 among ADC+981 · median -85
Absorbs damage · rank 89 of 100 among ADC503 · median 361
Plays teamfights · rank 18 of 100 among ADC53% · median 56%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 93 of 100 among ADC23% · median 19%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 31 of 100 among ADCrank 31 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 33 of 100 among ADC0.4 · median 0.6
Team damage · rank 66 of 100 among ADC25% · median 23%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Wukong47.4% · expected 47.0% · 38 g+0.3 ptSoloQ +0.9

Midgap to expected

Viktor54.1% · expected 49.0% · 37 g+5.1 ptSoloQ -0.5

Ahri48.5% · expected 47.3% · 33 g+1.1 ptSoloQ -1.1

ADCgap to expected

Caitlyn50.9% · expected 47.5% · 53 g+3.4 ptSoloQ -1.2

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Lee Sin52.9% · expected 49.1% · 34 g+3.8 ptSoloQ +0.5

Jarvan IV50.0% · expected 47.8% · 30 g+2.2 ptSoloQ -0.9

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

Nautilus52.1% · expected 49.5% · 71 g+2.6 ptSoloQ -0.8

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top19 champions