Tournament presence · pick + ban
27.0%#15 of 173 champions
Pick
10.9%picked in 3,102 of 28,449 games
Ban
16.1%3,742 bans over 23,178 games, against 14.3% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid46.6% between 42.1% and 51.1% over 335 gamesSoloQ 49.3%: no clear gap
Median length28.3 minsoloQ 27 min

Amateur: 28,642 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 24% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 897,301 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    0.6%
    SoloQ
    0.3%
    0.6% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 0.3% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    16.6%
    SoloQ
    14.3%
    16.6% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 14.3% in soloQ over 364,710 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.3 min
    SoloQ
    27 min
    Median of 28.3 min in amateur play, against 27 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Arcane Comet, then Malignance, Stormsurge, and Shadowflame: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesArcane Comet82% · 5,267
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport59% · 3,816
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 92% · 44 games
Core (3 legendaries)15% · 228
15%of soloQ games
  1. Malignance
  2. Stormsurge
  3. Shadowflame
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Below the floor: no measure published.

Below the floor: no measure published.

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

No pair measured in amateur play on this side.

05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+0.3%5,712 picks of 1,794,592ban 14.3% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments0.6%215 picks of 38,304ban 16.6% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.0%0 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

26.6% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 0.9%G166 games of 7,184
  • 1.1%G277 games of 7,193
  • 1.0%G3+30 games of 2,866
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 66 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.