Tournament presence · pick + ban
31.8%#7 of 173 champions
Pick
13.8%picked in 2,542 of 18,483 games
Ban
18.0%3,157 bans over 17,533 games, against 13.6% in soloQ
Win rate as Jungle— 6 wins over 18 games
Median length—soloQ 25.7 min

Amateur: 18,736 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 325,271 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

One clear gap between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Jungle.

  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    18.1%
    SoloQ
    13.6%
    18.1% ban rate in amateur play over 11,141 games, against 13.6% in soloQ over 132,897 games.

Not enough games to judge: win rate, length, keystone, spells, and core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Lethal Tempo, then Kraken Slayer, Immortal Shieldbow, and Infinity Edge: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesLethal Tempo82% · 300
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Smite100% · 364
Same in amateur play
Core (3 legendaries)14% · 20
14%of soloQ games
  1. Kraken Slayer
  2. Immortal Shieldbow
  3. Infinity Edge
Amateur: Yun Tal Wildarrows, The Collector, Edge of Night, gap not settled

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Below the floor: no measure published.

Below the floor: no measure published.

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

No pair measured in amateur play on this side.

05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Not enough series to settle it: raw counts only.

Pick rate as Jungle

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+0.1%349 picks of 650,542ban 13.6% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments0.0%9 picks of 23,550ban 18.1% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.0%0 picks of 2,224bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

31.2% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Jungle
Once picked, the series moves on to

Not enough series yet: published from 30.

Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.