Tournament presence · pick + ban
5.7%#112 of 173 champions
Pick
2.2%picked in 415 of 18,598 games
Ban
3.5%623 bans over 17,642 games, against 0.7% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid47.6% between 42.5% and 52.8% over 254 gamesSoloQ 50.7%: no clear gap
Median length29.1 minsoloQ 26 min

Amateur: 18,736 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 316,098 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftPicked less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    0.6%
    SoloQ
    1.0%
    0.6% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.0% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    2.9%
    SoloQ
    0.7%
    2.9% ban rate in amateur play over 11,141 games, against 0.7% in soloQ over 123,725 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.1 min
    SoloQ
    26 min
    Median of 29.1 min in amateur play, against 26 min in soloQ.
  • BuildHextech Rocketbelt, Riftmaker, Rabadon's Deathcap instead of Stormsurge, Liandry's Torment, Void Staff
    Amateur
    11%
    SoloQ
    17%
    Played in 11% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Stormsurge, Liandry's Torment, Void Staff (17%).
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Stormraider's Surge, then Stormsurge, Liandry's Torment, and Void Staff: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesStormraider's Surge56% · 4,074
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ghost65% · 4,672
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 97% · 31 games
Core (3 legendaries)17% · 408
17%of soloQ games
  1. Stormsurge
  2. Liandry's Torment
  3. Void Staff
≠ Amateur: Hextech Rocketbelt, Riftmaker, Rabadon's Deathcap instead of Stormsurge, Liandry's Torment, Void Staff. 11% · 150 games

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 94% of mid laners.

  1. Team damagetop6%25% · mid laners: 21%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • Damage
  • Poke

Like other mid laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Map pressure
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills

What it is not

  • Little CC
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 49 in lane, 96 in mid game and 92 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

5270 vs 528
1,062+162 vs 899
1,462+283 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Vladimirmid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 57% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
3takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 49 of 100 among mid laners527 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 96 of 100 among mid laners1,062 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 92 of 100 among mid laners1,462 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 48 of 100 among mid laners-1 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 57 of 100 among mid laners+164 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 28 of 100 among mid laners3 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 60 of 100 among mid laners573 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 67 of 100 among mid laners57% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 55 of 100 among mid laners23% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 63 of 100 among mid lanersrank 63 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 12 of 100 among mid laners0.2 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 94 of 100 among mid laners25% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected
Caitlyn50.0% · expected 45.5% · 30 g+4.5 ptSoloQ -0.9
Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top15 champions
  • Malphite19 games
    —SoloQ: 50.3% · 187 g
  • Aatrox14 games
    —SoloQ: 51.9% · 210 g
  • K'Sante12 games
    —SoloQ: 50.9% · 285 g
  • Renekton11 games
    —SoloQ: 53.5% · 185 g
  • Zaahen11 games
    —SoloQ: 49.5% · 99 g
Jungle17 champions
  • Vi25 games
    —SoloQ: 56.8% · 243 g
  • Sylas22 games
    —SoloQ: 49.9% · 361 g
  • Lee Sin19 games
    —SoloQ: 49.4% · 872 g
  • Wukong14 games
    —SoloQ: 60.2% · 176 g
  • Nocturne13 games
    —SoloQ: 62.3% · 77 g
Mid16 champions
  • Ahri13 games
    —SoloQ: 50.5% · 220 g
  • Sylas13 games
    —SoloQ: 54.7% · 331 g
  • Syndra13 games
    —SoloQ: 49.5% · 297 g
  • Lissandra12 games
    —SoloQ: 49.4% · 176 g
  • Viktor11 games
    —SoloQ: 53.0% · 355 g
ADC16 champions
  • Caitlyn30 games
    50.0%gap +4.5 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 373 g
  • Ezreal26 games
    —SoloQ: 55.0% · 473 g
  • Kai'Sa24 games
    —SoloQ: 53.9% · 852 g
  • Yunara22 games
    —SoloQ: 52.4% · 638 g
  • Lucian14 games
    —SoloQ: 52.5% · 301 g
Support16 champions
  • Nautilus23 games
    —SoloQ: 54.8% · 562 g
  • Thresh19 games
    —SoloQ: 48.0% · 602 g
  • Lulu17 games
    —SoloQ: 48.9% · 575 g
  • Seraphine17 games
    —SoloQ: 47.2% · 123 g
  • Blitzcrank15 games
    —SoloQ: 49.9% · 337 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Fallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.0%6,579 picks of 632,195ban 0.7% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments0.6%139 picks of 23,550ban 2.9% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.1%2 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

4.5% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 1.2%G152 games of 4,259
  • 1.1%G248 games of 4,263
  • 1.9%G3+34 games of 1,824
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 52 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.