Champion sheet · Mid

Vex

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · KR

Tournament presence · pick + ban

10.0%#84 of 173 champions

Pick: 4.6%picked in 846 of 18,499 games
Ban: 5.4%956 bans over 17,547 games, against 3.9% in soloQ

Win rate as Mid51.7% between 48.8% and 54.5% over 832 gamesSoloQ 52.1%: no clear gap

Median length29.3 minsoloQ 26.2 min

Amateur: 18,736 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 316,098 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.DraftLength
How to play itElectrocute, then Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compCrowd control (CC) first: more CC than 81% of mid laners.Map pressureCC
With / againstBetter than expected against Caitlyn in amateur play: +12.5 pts over 71 games, range above zero.+12.5 pt71 games
In draftTaken at any point of the series.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
2.3%
SoloQ
1.6%
2.3% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.6% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
5.9%
SoloQ
3.9%
5.9% ban rate in amateur play over 11,141 games, against 3.9% in soloQ over 123,725 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
29.3 min
SoloQ
26.2 min
Median of 29.3 min in amateur play, against 26.2 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Electrocute, then Luden's Echo, Shadowflame, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesElectrocute83% · 9,262

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Ignite67% · 7,447

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 99% · 104 games

Core (3 legendaries)37% · 1,316

37%of soloQ games

Luden's Echo
Shadowflame
Zhonya's Hourglass

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 81% of mid laners.

Crowd control (CC)top19%1.1 · mid laners: 0.7
Map pressuretop20%4.1 · mid laners: 3.2

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

Map pressure
CC

Like other mid laners

Damage in lane
Damage in mid game
Damage in late game
Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Absorbs damage
Plays teamfights
Takes its kills in duels
Lets allies carry kills
Team damage

What it is not

No poke
No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 74 in lane, 74 in mid game and 70 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

574+46 vs 528

964+65 vs 899

1,271+92 vs 1,179

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Vexmid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 67% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners

4.1takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 74 of 100 among mid laners574 · median 528
Damage in mid game · rank 74 of 100 among mid laners964 · median 899
Damage in late game · rank 70 of 100 among mid laners1,271 · median 1,179
Gold at 15 min · rank 40 of 100 among mid laners-52 · median +25
Gold at 20 min · rank 33 of 100 among mid laners-171 · median +71
Map pressure · rank 80 of 100 among mid laners4.1 · median 3.2
Absorbs damage · rank 45 of 100 among mid laners457 · median 489
Plays teamfights · rank 63 of 100 among mid laners56% · median 55%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 47 of 100 among mid laners22% · median 23%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 42 of 100 among mid lanersrank 42 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 81 of 100 among mid laners1.1 · median 0.7
Team damage · rank 73 of 100 among mid laners24% · median 21%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Caitlyn in amateur play: +12.5 pts over 71 games, range above zero.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

Ambessa60.5% · expected 52.2% · 38 g+8.3 ptSoloQ +5.0

Renekton58.8% · expected 51.4% · 34 g+7.4 ptSoloQ -2.1

Ornn53.1% · expected 49.8% · 32 g+3.3 ptSoloQ -4.6

Sion54.5% · expected 52.3% · 33 g+2.3 ptSoloQ -2.8

K'Sante54.3% · expected 53.6% · 35 g+0.6 ptSoloQ +4.7

Junglegap to expected

Lee Sin58.5% · expected 52.9% · 82 g+5.6 ptSoloQ +0.4

Midgap to expected

Ahri61.1% · expected 48.9% · 54 g+12.2 ptSoloQ +6.0

LeBlanc61.1% · expected 51.8% · 90 g+9.3 ptSoloQ +2.3

Syndra57.5% · expected 51.3% · 40 g+6.2 ptSoloQ -5.8

Sylas55.2% · expected 53.6% · 67 g+1.6 ptSoloQ +5.2

ADCgap to expected

Caitlyn62.0% · expected 49.5% · 71 g+12.5 ptSoloQ +3.7

Jhin63.3% · expected 55.8% · 60 g+7.6 ptSoloQ -1.8

Jinx53.7% · expected 47.5% · 54 g+6.2 ptSoloQ -1.1

Kai'Sa54.7% · expected 51.2% · 75 g+3.5 ptSoloQ -2.3

Yunara50.0% · expected 49.4% · 80 g+0.6 ptSoloQ -1.5

Supportgap to expected

Thresh62.5% · expected 50.3% · 64 g+12.2 ptSoloQ +1.7

Seraphine59.1% · expected 50.2% · 44 g+8.9 ptSoloQ +2.8

Rakan58.7% · expected 51.9% · 46 g+6.8 ptSoloQ +1.1

Nautilus54.9% · expected 52.9% · 71 g+2.0 ptSoloQ -1.6

Alistar54.5% · expected 50.6% · 44 g+4.0 ptSoloQ -2.2

With

Topgap to expected

Nasus59.4% · expected 53.2% · 32 g+6.1 ptSoloQ -5.7

Aatrox57.6% · expected 52.3% · 33 g+5.3 ptSoloQ +1.0

Ornn58.1% · expected 53.6% · 31 g+4.5 ptSoloQ -6.1

Gnar54.8% · expected 50.8% · 31 g+4.1 ptSoloQ +2.4

Renekton53.8% · expected 52.0% · 39 g+1.9 ptSoloQ +1.5

Junglegap to expected

Wukong59.7% · expected 56.1% · 67 g+3.6 ptSoloQ -0.1

Jarvan IV50.0% · expected 49.9% · 46 g+0.1 ptSoloQ -0.4

ADCgap to expected

Caitlyn61.1% · expected 53.9% · 72 g+7.3 ptSoloQ -1.2

Tristana59.0% · expected 50.2% · 39 g+8.7 ptSoloQ -1.4

Lucian56.6% · expected 51.3% · 53 g+5.3 ptSoloQ +2.3

Yunara54.3% · expected 53.9% · 92 g+0.4 ptSoloQ 0.0

Zeri59.4% · expected 55.2% · 32 g+4.2 ptSoloQ -0.4

Supportgap to expected

Braum60.8% · expected 54.0% · 51 g+6.8 ptSoloQ -0.4

Nautilus54.7% · expected 50.4% · 75 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +1.9

Rakan59.4% · expected 51.4% · 32 g+8.0 ptSoloQ +1.6

Lulu52.1% · expected 49.5% · 71 g+2.6 ptSoloQ -0.9

Thresh55.4% · expected 53.0% · 65 g+2.4 ptSoloQ +3.1

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top22 champions