Tournament presence · pick + ban
19.9%#29 of 173 champions
Pick
12.1%picked in 350 of 2,887 games
Ban
7.8%163 bans over 2,099 games, against 11.0% in soloQ
Win rate as Top— 3 wins over 5 games
Median length—soloQ 28.1 min

Amateur: 2,915 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, NA. SoloQ Master+: 237,028 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

One clear gap between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • DraftBanned less often in amateur play
    Amateur
    8.1%
    SoloQ
    11.0%
    8.1% ban rate in amateur play over 1,538 games, against 11.0% in soloQ over 103,691 games.

Not enough games to judge: win rate, length, keystone, spells, and core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Lethal Tempo, then Yun Tal Wildarrows, Infinity Edge, and Lord Dominik's Regards: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesLethal Tempo86% · 401
Same in amateur play
SpellsExhaust + Flash43% · 200
Same in amateur play
Core (3 legendaries)17% · 36
17%of soloQ games
  1. Yun Tal Wildarrows
  2. Infinity Edge
  3. Lord Dominik's Regards
Amateur: Kraken Slayer, Navori Flickerblade, Lord Dominik's Regards, gap not settled

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Below the floor: no measure published.

Below the floor: no measure published.

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

No pair measured in amateur play on this side.

05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Not enough series to settle it: raw counts only.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+0.1%417 picks of 474,050ban 11.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments0.1%3 picks of 4,328ban 8.1% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.2%5 picks of 2,224bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

16.5% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
Once picked, the series moves on to

Not enough series yet: published from 30.

Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.