Champion sheet · Top

Rumble

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · KR

Tournament presence · pick + ban

7.2%#100 of 173 champions

Pick: 3.3%picked in 605 of 18,516 games
Ban: 3.9%677 bans over 17,562 games, against 2.8% in soloQ

Win rate as Top52.2% between 48.7% and 55.6% over 556 gamesSoloQ 48.8%: no clear gap

Median length29.6 minsoloQ 26.4 min

Amateur: 18,736 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 316,098 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.DraftLength
How to play itDeathfire Touch, then Liandry's Torment, Bloodletter's Curse, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compPlays teamfights first: more teamfights than 94% of top laners.TeamfightDamage
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftTaken at any point of the series.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

2 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
3.5%
SoloQ
2.8%
3.5% ban rate in amateur play over 11,141 games, against 2.8% in soloQ over 123,725 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
29.6 min
SoloQ
26.4 min
Median of 29.6 min in amateur play, against 26.4 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Deathfire Touch, then Liandry's Torment, Bloodletter's Curse, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesDeathfire Touch71% · 7,102

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Ignite62% · 6,155

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 99% · 81 games

Core (3 legendaries)25% · 603

25%of soloQ games

Liandry's Torment
Bloodletter's Curse
Zhonya's Hourglass

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Plays teamfights first: more teamfights than 94% of top laners.

Plays teamfightstop7%59% · top laners: 53%
Team damagetop10%25% · top laners: 20%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

Teamfight
Damage

Like other top laners

Damage in lane
Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Absorbs damage
Lets allies carry kills
Crowd control (CC)

What it is not

Few duels
No poke
No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 57 in lane, 83 in mid game and 92 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

611+12 vs 599

954+86 vs 868

1,263+184 vs 1,079

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Rumbletop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 69% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 57 of 100 among top laners611 · median 599
Damage in mid game · rank 83 of 100 among top laners954 · median 868
Damage in late game · rank 92 of 100 among top laners1,263 · median 1,079
Gold at 15 min · rank 36 of 100 among top laners-22 · median +119
Gold at 20 min · rank 31 of 100 among top laners-114 · median +100
Absorbs damage · rank 41 of 100 among top laners832 · median 970
Plays teamfights · rank 94 of 100 among top laners59% · median 53%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 10 of 100 among top laners22% · median 28%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 49 of 100 among top lanersrank 49 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 32 of 100 among top laners0.6 · median 0.8
Team damage · rank 90 of 100 among top laners25% · median 20%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

Ambessa60.0% · expected 52.7% · 30 g+7.3 ptSoloQ -1.4

Aatrox57.6% · expected 51.5% · 33 g+6.1 ptSoloQ -1.1

Junglegap to expected

Wukong59.2% · expected 47.8% · 49 g+11.4 ptSoloQ +0.5

Vi57.9% · expected 52.1% · 38 g+5.8 ptSoloQ +4.6

Midgap to expected

Syndra64.5% · expected 51.7% · 31 g+12.8 ptSoloQ +0.6

ADCgap to expected

Yunara62.9% · expected 49.9% · 35 g+13.0 ptSoloQ -1.7

Xayah56.0% · expected 50.2% · 50 g+5.8 ptSoloQ -1.7

Jinx55.9% · expected 48.0% · 34 g+7.9 ptSoloQ -1.2

Ashe56.7% · expected 49.8% · 30 g+6.9 ptSoloQ +3.0

Jhin57.5% · expected 56.2% · 40 g+1.3 ptSoloQ -0.6

Supportgap to expected

Milio58.3% · expected 53.7% · 36 g+4.6 ptSoloQ +2.4

Nautilus53.8% · expected 53.4% · 52 g+0.4 ptSoloQ +1.9

With

Junglegap to expected

Lee Sin58.5% · expected 50.9% · 65 g+7.5 ptSoloQ -0.8

Vi55.7% · expected 52.2% · 61 g+3.5 ptSoloQ -2.1

Midgap to expected

Yone65.9% · expected 55.4% · 44 g+10.5 ptSoloQ -1.3

ADCgap to expected

Caitlyn66.7% · expected 54.3% · 45 g+12.4 ptSoloQ +1.9

Lucian60.6% · expected 51.7% · 33 g+8.9 ptSoloQ -0.9

Yunara59.6% · expected 54.4% · 57 g+5.2 ptSoloQ +1.1

Kai'Sa58.1% · expected 52.6% · 31 g+5.4 ptSoloQ -3.6

Supportgap to expected

Milio62.9% · expected 50.6% · 35 g+12.2 ptSoloQ +0.1

Braum63.0% · expected 54.4% · 46 g+8.6 ptSoloQ +0.4

Blitzcrank57.1% · expected 53.0% · 35 g+4.1 ptSoloQ -0.7

Lulu52.4% · expected 50.0% · 42 g+2.4 ptSoloQ -0.1

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top22 champions