udrafter
Champion sheet · Top

Nasus

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · KR
Tournament presence · pick + ban
20.8%#27 of 173 champions
Pick
8.3%picked in 1,542 of 18,499 games
Ban
12.5%2,188 bans over 17,547 games, against 6.5% in soloQ
Win rate as Top51.6% between 49.2% and 53.9% over 1,249 gamesSoloQ 49.8%: no clear gap
Median length28.7 minsoloQ 26 min

Amateur: 18,736 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 316,098 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    2.5%
    SoloQ
    1.7%
    2.5% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.7% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    9.2%
    SoloQ
    6.5%
    9.2% ban rate in amateur play over 11,141 games, against 6.5% in soloQ over 123,725 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.7 min
    SoloQ
    26 min
    Median of 28.7 min in amateur play, against 26 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Fleet Footwork, then Trinity Force, Frozen Heart, and Spirit Visage: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesFleet Footwork64% · 8,229
Same in amateur play
SpellsGhost + Teleport50% · 6,512
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 98% · 100 games
Core (3 legendaries)20% · 674
20%of soloQ games
  1. Trinity Force
  2. Frozen Heart
  3. Spirit Visage
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Absorbs damage first: absorbs more than 94% of top laners.

  1. Absorbs damagetop7%1,565 · top laners: 970

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Frontline
  • Split-push

Like other top laners

  • Gold at 20 min
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Crowd control (CC)
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 15 in lane, 91 in mid game and 77 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

537-62 vs 599
978+110 vs 868
1,171+92 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Nasustop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 73% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 15 of 100 among top laners537 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 91 of 100 among top laners978 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 77 of 100 among top laners1,171 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 16 of 100 among top laners-404 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 28 of 100 among top laners-177 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 94 of 100 among top laners1,565 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 57 of 100 among top laners54% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 55 of 100 among top laners29% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 72 of 100 among top lanersrank 72 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 40 of 100 among top laners0.7 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 59 of 100 among top laners22% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Braum in amateur play: +12.3 pts over 86 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Olaf58.7% · expected 49.9% · 46 g+8.8 ptSoloQ +3.5
Dr. Mundo57.8% · expected 53.2% · 64 g+4.6 ptSoloQ +0.3
Malphite52.3% · expected 50.1% · 109 g+2.2 ptSoloQ +4.5
Shen56.5% · expected 51.6% · 46 g+5.0 ptSoloQ -9.3
Garen54.2% · expected 50.9% · 59 g+3.4 ptSoloQ -5.8
Junglegap to expected
Lillia61.5% · expected 48.7% · 39 g+12.8 ptSoloQ +0.6
Wukong54.9% · expected 47.1% · 71 g+7.8 ptSoloQ -0.3
Lee Sin54.8% · expected 52.8% · 146 g+2.0 ptSoloQ +0.2
Cho'Gath53.3% · expected 50.0% · 30 g+3.4 ptSoloQ -0.6
Midgap to expected
Vex61.1% · expected 49.9% · 36 g+11.2 ptSoloQ -2.6
Viktor55.7% · expected 51.5% · 70 g+4.2 ptSoloQ -2.6
Sylas56.0% · expected 53.5% · 75 g+2.5 ptSoloQ +0.4
Akali56.8% · expected 52.6% · 44 g+4.2 ptSoloQ -1.9
Orianna58.2% · expected 55.3% · 55 g+2.8 ptSoloQ -1.9
ADCgap to expected
Tristana66.7% · expected 53.0% · 48 g+13.7 ptSoloQ -1.7
Lucian56.6% · expected 52.0% · 83 g+4.6 ptSoloQ +0.6
Caitlyn51.0% · expected 49.4% · 102 g+1.6 ptSoloQ -0.3
Jhin56.7% · expected 55.6% · 67 g+1.1 ptSoloQ -2.9
Ashe52.4% · expected 49.1% · 42 g+3.3 ptSoloQ +0.2
Supportgap to expected
Braum61.6% · expected 49.3% · 86 g+12.3 ptSoloQ -2.3
Neeko65.6% · expected 49.7% · 32 g+15.9 ptSoloQ +2.5
Seraphine58.5% · expected 50.1% · 65 g+8.4 ptSoloQ +2.0
Rakan61.2% · expected 51.8% · 49 g+9.4 ptSoloQ -2.2
Rell54.3% · expected 47.4% · 46 g+7.0 ptSoloQ -1.5

With

Junglegap to expected
Sejuani67.6% · expected 51.7% · 34 g+16.0 ptSoloQ +4.6
Xin Zhao61.8% · expected 51.8% · 34 g+10.0 ptSoloQ -4.6
Jayce56.8% · expected 49.6% · 37 g+7.1 ptSoloQ -0.3
Vi52.7% · expected 51.5% · 74 g+1.2 ptSoloQ +1.9
Lillia57.9% · expected 54.4% · 38 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +6.1
Midgap to expected
Syndra58.9% · expected 52.0% · 73 g+6.9 ptSoloQ +0.9
Akali58.5% · expected 50.5% · 41 g+8.0 ptSoloQ -4.7
Cassiopeia58.8% · expected 52.7% · 34 g+6.2 ptSoloQ +2.5
Viktor51.8% · expected 51.6% · 85 g+0.1 ptSoloQ -2.3
Hwei56.8% · expected 53.0% · 37 g+3.7 ptSoloQ +3.8
ADCgap to expected
Caitlyn63.5% · expected 53.7% · 104 g+9.7 ptSoloQ +1.9
Lucian60.0% · expected 51.1% · 80 g+8.9 ptSoloQ -0.8
Kai'Sa57.4% · expected 52.0% · 101 g+5.4 ptSoloQ -1.4
Yunara56.2% · expected 53.8% · 121 g+2.4 ptSoloQ +1.0
Tristana58.3% · expected 50.1% · 36 g+8.2 ptSoloQ +1.1
Supportgap to expected
Milio63.8% · expected 50.0% · 58 g+13.7 ptSoloQ -5.9
Nautilus56.7% · expected 50.3% · 127 g+6.4 ptSoloQ +2.3
Alistar59.2% · expected 52.6% · 49 g+6.5 ptSoloQ -0.2
Lulu51.7% · expected 49.4% · 116 g+2.3 ptSoloQ +2.9
Braum56.1% · expected 53.8% · 82 g+2.3 ptSoloQ -3.7

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top25 champions
  • Malphite109 games
    52.3%gap +2.2 ptsSoloQ: 52.8% · 509 g
  • Ornn67 games
    44.8%gap -4.9 ptsSoloQ: 48.9% · 141 g
  • Dr. Mundo64 games
    57.8%gap +4.6 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 339 g
  • Sion61 games
    47.5%gap -4.6 ptsSoloQ: 50.0% · 182 g
  • Garen59 games
    54.2%gap +3.4 ptsSoloQ: 42.9% · 361 g
Jungle21 champions
  • Lee Sin146 games
    54.8%gap +2.0 ptsSoloQ: 49.6% · 1,494 g
  • Jarvan IV83 games
    49.4%gap -3.9 ptsSoloQ: 48.9% · 452 g
  • Vi80 games
    47.5%gap -4.1 ptsSoloQ: 51.2% · 412 g
  • Sylas75 games
    44.0%gap -6.9 ptsSoloQ: 48.2% · 596 g
  • Wukong71 games
    54.9%gap +7.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 304 g
Mid19 champions
  • Sylas75 games
    56.0%gap +2.5 ptsSoloQ: 52.3% · 644 g
  • Viktor70 games
    55.7%gap +4.2 ptsSoloQ: 48.8% · 692 g
  • Ahri67 games
    47.8%gap -1.0 ptsSoloQ: 49.4% · 421 g
  • Syndra67 games
    44.8%gap -6.4 ptsSoloQ: 52.9% · 544 g
  • Orianna55 games
    58.2%gap +2.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.0% · 306 g
ADC16 champions
  • Yunara139 games
    47.5%gap -1.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.5% · 1,173 g
  • Kai'Sa107 games
    46.7%gap -4.4 ptsSoloQ: 53.8% · 1,477 g
  • Caitlyn102 games
    51.0%gap +1.6 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 710 g
  • Ezreal88 games
    55.7%gap -0.4 ptsSoloQ: 54.9% · 921 g
  • Lucian83 games
    56.6%gap +4.6 ptsSoloQ: 52.4% · 569 g
Support16 champions
  • Nautilus118 games
    49.2%gap -3.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 915 g
  • Lulu114 games
    48.2%gap -5.5 ptsSoloQ: 47.9% · 1,091 g
  • Leona88 games
    52.3%gap +1.5 ptsSoloQ: 46.8% · 477 g
  • Braum86 games
    61.6%gap +12.3 ptsSoloQ: 44.9% · 410 g
  • Milio85 games
    48.2%gap -4.8 ptsSoloQ: 54.5% · 266 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.7%10,980 picks of 632,193ban 6.5% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments2.5%583 picks of 23,550ban 9.2% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.6%13 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

8.3% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 6.4%G1273 games of 4,245
  • 5.9%G2249 games of 4,245
  • 6.3%G3+115 games of 1,815
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 273 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.