Champion sheet · Jungle

Naafiri

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · KR

Bans, presence and fearless: Naafiri across all builds. Build, best results and matchups: the selected build.

Tournament presence · pick + ban
19.2%#34 of 173 champions
Pick
8.4%picked in 1,543 of 18,478 games
Ban
10.8%1,897 bans over 17,528 games, against 9.5% in soloQ
Win rate as Jungle48.9% between 46.7% and 51.1% over 1,383 gamesSoloQ 47.9%: no clear gap
Median length29.1 minsoloQ 26 min

Amateur: 18,736 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 325,271 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Jungle.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    3.5%
    SoloQ
    2.2%
    3.5% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 2.2% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    11.0%
    SoloQ
    9.5%
    11.0% ban rate in amateur play over 11,141 games, against 9.5% in soloQ over 132,897 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.1 min
    SoloQ
    26 min
    Median of 29.1 min in amateur play, against 26 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Conqueror, then Voltaic Cyclosword, Black Cleaver, and Death's Dance: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesConqueror97% · 14,867
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Smite99% · 15,143
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 38 games
Core (3 legendaries)33% · 2,284
33%of soloQ games
  1. Voltaic Cyclosword
  2. Black Cleaver
  3. Death's Dance
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Invade first: invades more than 91% of junglers.

  1. Invadetop9%10% · junglers: 7%
  2. Team damagetop16%21% · junglers: 17%
  3. Map pressuretop22%5.2 · junglers: 4.7

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other junglers

What marks it

  • Map pressure
  • Duelist
  • Damage
  • Invade

Like other junglers

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Plays teamfights
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Jungle farm

What it is not

  • Little CC
  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 72 in lane, 86 in mid game and 70 in late game, out of 100 junglers.

397+14 vs 383
886+90 vs 796
1,134+79 vs 1,056
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Naafirijunglers

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 69% of junglers against the direct opponent.

junglers
5.2takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; junglers: 4.7.

Where it stands among junglers · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 72 of 100 among junglers397 · median 383
  • Damage in mid game · rank 86 of 100 among junglers886 · median 796
  • Damage in late game · rank 70 of 100 among junglers1,134 · median 1,056
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 71 of 100 among junglers+180 · median +6
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 69 of 100 among junglers+240 · median +64
  • Map pressure · rank 78 of 100 among junglers5.2 · median 4.7
  • Absorbs damage · rank 22 of 100 among junglers520 · median 855
  • Plays teamfights · rank 29 of 100 among junglers50% · median 52%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 76 of 100 among junglers23% · median 20%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 39 of 100 among junglersrank 39 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 5 of 100 among junglers0.3 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 84 of 100 among junglers21% · median 17%
  • Jungle farm · rank 48 of 100 among junglers66 · median 66
  • Invade · rank 91 of 100 among junglers10% · median 7%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected
Lee Sin51.4% · expected 45.6% · 35 g+5.8 ptSoloQ +0.4
Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top17 champions
  • Ambessa12 games
    —SoloQ: 47.9% · 553 g
  • K'Sante12 games
    —SoloQ: 50.0% · 672 g
  • Gnar11 games
    —SoloQ: 47.5% · 358 g
  • Mordekaiser10 games
    —SoloQ: 47.7% · 199 g
  • Sion10 games
    —SoloQ: 44.8% · 250 g
Jungle15 champions
  • Lee Sin35 games
    51.4%gap +5.8 ptsSoloQ: 47.9% · 3,073 g
  • Sylas18 games
    —SoloQ: 51.3% · 612 g
  • Jarvan IV14 games
    —SoloQ: 50.2% · 466 g
  • Jayce12 games
    —SoloQ: 49.8% · 287 g
  • Wukong12 games
    —SoloQ: 45.0% · 373 g
Mid17 champions
  • Syndra19 games
    —SoloQ: 49.6% · 683 g
  • Orianna14 games
    —SoloQ: 46.4% · 364 g
  • Ahri12 games
    —SoloQ: 48.3% · 536 g
  • Yone12 games
    —SoloQ: 42.0% · 657 g
  • LeBlanc9 games
    —SoloQ: 50.0% · 404 g
ADC16 champions
  • Kai'Sa27 games
    —SoloQ: 48.4% · 1,719 g
  • Lucian23 games
    —SoloQ: 52.1% · 674 g
  • Caitlyn20 games
    —SoloQ: 51.0% · 878 g
  • Yunara20 games
    —SoloQ: 42.2% · 1,398 g
  • Jinx16 games
    —SoloQ: 44.1% · 863 g
Support17 champions
  • Milio18 games
    —SoloQ: 51.6% · 287 g
  • Lulu17 games
    —SoloQ: 43.6% · 1,219 g
  • Karma15 games
    —SoloQ: 48.7% · 594 g
  • Nautilus15 games
    —SoloQ: 49.2% · 1,090 g
  • Thresh15 games
    —SoloQ: 46.1% · 1,231 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Jungle

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+2.2%14,045 picks of 650,542ban 9.5% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments3.5%825 picks of 23,550ban 11.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro6.3%139 picks of 2,224bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

12.6% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Jungle
  • 7.5%G1318 games of 4,241
  • 7.8%G2332 games of 4,241
  • 7.8%G3+141 games of 1,815
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 318 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.