Champion sheet · ADC

Corki

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · EUW
Tournament presence · pick + ban
6.5%#101 of 173 champions
Pick
4.5%picked in 315 of 6,991 games
Ban
2.0%70 bans over 3,461 games, against 0.3% in soloQ
Win rate as ADC50.9% between 46.0% and 55.7% over 283 gamesSoloQ 48.5%: no clear gap
Median length29.6 minsoloQ 27.9 min

Amateur: 6,991 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 346,746 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as ADC.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    2.0%
    SoloQ
    1.0%
    2.0% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.0% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    2.0%
    SoloQ
    0.3%
    2.0% ban rate in amateur play over 2,100 games, against 0.3% in soloQ over 139,864 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29.6 min
    SoloQ
    27.9 min
    Median of 29.6 min in amateur play, against 27.9 min in soloQ.
  • BuildTrinity Force, Manamune, Lord Dominik's Regards instead of Trinity Force, Manamune, The Collector
    Amateur
    30%
    SoloQ
    18%
    Played in 30% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Trinity Force, Manamune, The Collector (18%).
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Conqueror, then Trinity Force, Manamune, and The Collector: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesConqueror88% · 6,742
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Barrier73% · 5,610
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 98% · 45 games
Core (3 legendaries)18% · 858
18%of soloQ games
  1. Trinity Force
  2. Manamune
  3. The Collector
≠ Amateur: Trinity Force, Manamune, Lord Dominik's Regards instead of Trinity Force, Manamune, The Collector. 30% · 240 games

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 87% of ADC.

  1. Team damagetop13%26% · ADC: 23%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other ADC

What marks it

  • Damage
  • Poke

Like other ADC

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills

What it is not

  • Little CC

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 64 in lane, 59 in mid game and 59 in late game, out of 100 ADC.

538+13 vs 525
953+38 vs 915
1,411+45 vs 1,366
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
CorkiADC

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 68% of ADC against the direct opponent.

ADC

Where it stands among ADC · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 64 of 100 among ADC538 · median 525
  • Damage in mid game · rank 59 of 100 among ADC953 · median 915
  • Damage in late game · rank 59 of 100 among ADC1,411 · median 1,366
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 60 of 100 among ADC-1 · median -54
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 68 of 100 among ADC+38 · median -85
  • Absorbs damage · rank 71 of 100 among ADC418 · median 361
  • Plays teamfights · rank 75 of 100 among ADC57% · median 56%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 35 of 100 among ADC17% · median 19%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 33 of 100 among ADCrank 33 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 6 of 100 among ADC0.1 · median 0.6
  • Team damage · rank 87 of 100 among ADC26% · median 23%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected
Wukong61.0% · expected 50.9% · 41 g+10.1 ptSoloQ +0.2
Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected
Jarvan IV60.0% · expected 50.2% · 30 g+9.8 ptSoloQ +2.7
Wukong55.6% · expected 50.9% · 36 g+4.7 ptSoloQ +4.8
Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected
Nami64.7% · expected 48.7% · 34 g+16.0 ptSoloQ +1.0

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top16 champions
  • Ornn25 games
    —SoloQ: 45.5% · 220 g
  • Sion23 games
    —SoloQ: 43.0% · 142 g
  • K'Sante20 games
    —SoloQ: 51.3% · 158 g
  • Ambessa19 games
    —SoloQ: 52.7% · 182 g
  • Gnar11 games
    —SoloQ: 48.8% · 170 g
Jungle15 champions
  • Jarvan IV44 games
    50.0%gap -1.5 ptsSoloQ: 45.2% · 323 g
  • Wukong41 games
    61.0%gap +10.1 ptsSoloQ: 47.7% · 281 g
  • Nocturne11 games
    —SoloQ: 52.9% · 102 g
  • Vi11 games
    —SoloQ: 59.0% · 117 g
  • Xin Zhao11 games
    —SoloQ: 41.9% · 93 g
Mid16 champions
  • Viktor37 games
    43.2%gap -7.3 ptsSoloQ: 52.6% · 310 g
  • Ahri29 games
    —SoloQ: 46.7% · 433 g
  • Orianna28 games
    —SoloQ: 51.3% · 158 g
  • Syndra22 games
    —SoloQ: 44.3% · 442 g
  • Hwei14 games
    —SoloQ: 49.7% · 161 g
ADC14 champions
  • Yunara41 games
    39.0%gap -9.9 ptsSoloQ: 48.4% · 593 g
  • Tristana35 games
    40.0%gap -7.1 ptsSoloQ: 48.9% · 981 g
  • Xayah23 games
    —SoloQ: 51.4% · 183 g
  • Caitlyn20 games
    —SoloQ: 44.3% · 314 g
  • Kai'Sa20 games
    —SoloQ: 52.3% · 602 g
Support15 champions
  • Lulu30 games
    23.3%gap -30.6 ptsSoloQ: 47.9% · 534 g
  • Milio24 games
    —SoloQ: 50.2% · 231 g
  • Rakan23 games
    —SoloQ: 48.6% · 247 g
  • Braum21 games
    —SoloQ: 51.5% · 301 g
  • Nautilus21 games
    —SoloQ: 51.6% · 490 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as ADC

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.0%7,054 picks of 693,491ban 0.3% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments2.0%205 picks of 10,426ban 2.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro3.1%68 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

5.8% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as ADC
  • 3.9%G183 games of 2,122
  • 4.5%G296 games of 2,122
  • 4.8%G3+33 games of 691
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 83 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.