Champion sheet · Mid

Zoe

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · KR

Tournament presence · pick + ban

7.3%#98 of 173 champions

Pick: 2.1%picked in 390 of 18,496 games
Ban: 5.2%921 bans over 17,544 games, against 10.6% in soloQ

Win rate as Mid53.5% between 49.1% and 57.9% over 344 gamesSoloQ 52.6%: no clear gap

Median length30.2 minsoloQ 26.3 min

Amateur: 18,736 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR. SoloQ Master+: 316,098 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.DraftLength
How to play itElectrocute, then Luden's Echo, Lich Bane, and Shadowflame: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compCrowd control (CC) first: more CC than 85% of mid laners.Map pressureCCDamageSplit-push
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftTaken at any point of the series.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

DraftPicked less often in amateur play
Amateur
1.0%
SoloQ
2.1%
1.0% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 2.1% in soloQ.
DraftBanned less often in amateur play
Amateur
5.5%
SoloQ
10.6%
5.5% ban rate in amateur play over 11,141 games, against 10.6% in soloQ over 123,725 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
30.2 min
SoloQ
26.3 min
Median of 30.2 min in amateur play, against 26.3 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Electrocute, then Luden's Echo, Lich Bane, and Shadowflame: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesElectrocute82% · 12,073

Same in amateur play

SpellsFlash + Ignite97% · 14,185

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 100% · 45 games

Core (3 legendaries)29% · 1,333

29%of soloQ games

Luden's Echo
Lich Bane
Shadowflame

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 85% of mid laners.

Crowd control (CC)top15%1.2 · mid laners: 0.7
Map pressuretop16%4.2 · mid laners: 3.2
Team damagetop16%24% · mid laners: 21%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

Map pressure
CC
Damage
Split-push

Like other mid laners

Damage in lane
Gold at 15 min
Gold at 20 min
Takes its kills in duels
Lets allies carry kills

What it is not

Few teamfights
No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 73 in lane, 93 in mid game and 84 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

573+45 vs 528

1,034+135 vs 899

1,379+200 vs 1,179

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Zoemid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 52% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners

4.2takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 73 of 100 among mid laners573 · median 528
Damage in mid game · rank 93 of 100 among mid laners1,034 · median 899
Damage in late game · rank 84 of 100 among mid laners1,379 · median 1,179
Gold at 15 min · rank 70 of 100 among mid laners+164 · median +25
Gold at 20 min · rank 48 of 100 among mid laners+53 · median +71
Map pressure · rank 84 of 100 among mid laners4.2 · median 3.2
Absorbs damage · rank 12 of 100 among mid laners296 · median 489
Plays teamfights · rank 24 of 100 among mid laners53% · median 55%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 59 of 100 among mid laners24% · median 23%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 50 of 100 among mid lanersrank 50 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 85 of 100 among mid laners1.2 · median 0.7
Team damage · rank 84 of 100 among mid laners24% · median 21%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

Yunara61.3% · expected 51.2% · 31 g+10.1 ptSoloQ +2.0

Ezreal62.9% · expected 58.0% · 35 g+4.9 ptSoloQ -1.8

Supportgap to expected

Lulu59.5% · expected 55.6% · 37 g+3.8 ptSoloQ +0.8

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Lee Sin55.1% · expected 52.3% · 49 g+2.8 ptSoloQ +1.2

Jarvan IV53.1% · expected 51.7% · 32 g+1.4 ptSoloQ +1.6

ADCgap to expected

Kai'Sa77.4% · expected 54.0% · 31 g+23.5 ptSoloQ -2.1

Jinx61.3% · expected 57.6% · 31 g+3.7 ptSoloQ -0.2

Supportgap to expected

Nautilus53.7% · expected 52.3% · 41 g+1.4 ptSoloQ -2.5

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top17 champions