Tournament presence · pick + ban
10.3%#73 of 173 champions
Pick
5.5%picked in 383 of 6,991 games
Ban
4.8%165 bans over 3,461 games, against 0.4% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid51.0% between 46.6% and 55.3% over 359 gamesSoloQ 46.0%: clear gap
Median length28.8 minsoloQ 27.5 min

Amateur: 6,991 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 346,746 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • Win rateWins more in amateur play
    Amateur
    51.0%
    SoloQ
    46.0%
    51.0% win rate in amateur play over 359 games, against 46.0% in soloQ over 10,175 games.
  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    2.3%
    SoloQ
    1.3%
    2.3% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.3% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    4.8%
    SoloQ
    0.4%
    4.8% ban rate in amateur play over 2,100 games, against 0.4% in soloQ over 139,864 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.8 min
    SoloQ
    27.5 min
    Median of 28.8 min in amateur play, against 27.5 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Deathfire Touch, then Rod of Ages, Archangel's Staff, and Actualizer: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesDeathfire Touch69% · 7,048
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ghost63% · 6,396
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 59 games
Core (3 legendaries)85% · 4,214
85%of soloQ games
  1. Rod of Ages
  2. Archangel's Staff
  3. Actualizer
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Map pressure first: more map pressure than 81% of mid laners.

  1. Map pressuretop19%3.4 · mid laners: 3.2
  2. Team damagetop20%24% · mid laners: 21%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • Map pressure
  • Damage
  • Poke

Like other mid laners

  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Lets allies carry kills
  • Crowd control (CC)

What it is not

  • Few duels
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 19 in lane, 24 in mid game and 81 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

492-36 vs 528
839-60 vs 899
1,352+174 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Ryzemid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 68% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
3.4takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 19 of 100 among mid laners492 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 24 of 100 among mid laners839 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 81 of 100 among mid laners1,352 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 34 of 100 among mid laners-112 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 32 of 100 among mid laners-173 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 81 of 100 among mid laners3.4 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 66 of 100 among mid laners612 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 69 of 100 among mid laners57% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 17 of 100 among mid laners17% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 37 of 100 among mid lanersrank 37 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 54 of 100 among mid laners0.7 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 80 of 100 among mid laners24% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ornn60.0% · expected 52.7% · 30 g+7.3 ptSoloQ -1.8
Junglegap to expected
Jarvan IV54.5% · expected 51.6% · 33 g+2.9 ptSoloQ -1.3
Wukong51.1% · expected 51.0% · 47 g+0.1 ptSoloQ +2.5
Midgap to expected
Ahri57.1% · expected 50.3% · 35 g+6.9 ptSoloQ +1.4
ADCgap to expected
Xayah53.3% · expected 50.6% · 30 g+2.8 ptSoloQ -1.8
Supportgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected
Jarvan IV55.0% · expected 50.3% · 40 g+4.7 ptSoloQ -0.9
ADCgap to expected
Ashe63.9% · expected 48.8% · 36 g+15.0 ptSoloQ +1.8
Supportgap to expected
Seraphine54.8% · expected 49.4% · 31 g+5.5 ptSoloQ +2.9
Nautilus55.3% · expected 54.1% · 38 g+1.2 ptSoloQ -0.8

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top18 champions
  • Ornn30 games
    60.0%gap +7.3 ptsSoloQ: 43.0% · 314 g
  • Renekton28 games
    —SoloQ: 51.5% · 307 g
  • K'Sante27 games
    —SoloQ: 47.6% · 229 g
  • Sion24 games
    —SoloQ: 46.3% · 201 g
  • Ambessa22 games
    —SoloQ: 51.6% · 258 g
Jungle16 champions
  • Wukong47 games
    51.1%gap +0.1 ptsSoloQ: 47.5% · 377 g
  • Jarvan IV33 games
    54.5%gap +2.9 ptsSoloQ: 45.0% · 340 g
  • Xin Zhao27 games
    —SoloQ: 45.7% · 129 g
  • Skarner25 games
    —SoloQ: 42.6% · 115 g
  • Vi23 games
    —SoloQ: 42.9% · 203 g
Mid17 champions
  • Ahri35 games
    57.1%gap +6.9 ptsSoloQ: 46.0% · 513 g
  • Orianna35 games
    37.1%gap -12.9 ptsSoloQ: 45.6% · 226 g
  • Viktor28 games
    —SoloQ: 50.1% · 399 g
  • Syndra27 games
    —SoloQ: 44.1% · 610 g
  • Anivia23 games
    —SoloQ: 45.7% · 184 g
ADC16 champions
  • Yunara55 games
    45.5%gap -3.6 ptsSoloQ: 46.1% · 811 g
  • Xayah30 games
    53.3%gap +2.8 ptsSoloQ: 42.5% · 306 g
  • Kai'Sa28 games
    —SoloQ: 51.5% · 784 g
  • Sivir28 games
    —SoloQ: 48.0% · 198 g
  • Ezreal20 games
    —SoloQ: 49.1% · 475 g
Support17 champions
  • Lulu40 games
    42.5%gap -11.5 ptsSoloQ: 45.5% · 840 g
  • Nautilus34 games
    44.1%gap -3.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.0% · 610 g
  • Milio25 games
    —SoloQ: 44.8% · 281 g
  • Braum24 games
    —SoloQ: 41.8% · 380 g
  • Karma24 games
    —SoloQ: 50.8% · 441 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Fallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.3%8,815 picks of 693,486ban 0.4% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments2.3%240 picks of 10,426ban 4.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro12.1%267 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

8.8% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 3.6%G177 games of 2,122
  • 5.7%G2121 games of 2,122
  • 8.0%G3+55 games of 691
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 77 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.