Tournament presence · pick + ban
31.4%#11 of 173 champions
Pick
19.2%picked in 1,342 of 6,991 games
Ban
12.2%421 bans over 3,461 games, against 0.6% in soloQ
Win rate as Top48.3% between 46.0% and 50.6% over 1,317 gamesSoloQ 51.2%: clear gap
Median length28.8 minsoloQ 27.6 min

Amateur: 6,991 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 346,746 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

4 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • Win rateWins less in amateur play
    Amateur
    48.3%
    SoloQ
    51.2%
    48.3% win rate in amateur play over 1,317 games, against 51.2% in soloQ over 21,422 games.
  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    9.7%
    SoloQ
    2.8%
    9.7% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 2.8% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    11.4%
    SoloQ
    0.6%
    11.4% ban rate in amateur play over 2,100 games, against 0.6% in soloQ over 139,864 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.8 min
    SoloQ
    27.6 min
    Median of 28.8 min in amateur play, against 27.6 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Grasp of the Undying, then Hollow Radiance, Unending Despair, and Jak'Sho, The Protean: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesGrasp of the Undying82% · 17,558
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport72% · 15,409
Same in amateur play
SkillsWnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 92% · 238 games
Core (3 legendaries)6% · 286
6%of soloQ games
  1. Hollow Radiance
  2. Unending Despair
  3. Jak'Sho, The Protean
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Lets allies carry kills first: lets allies carry more than 97% of top laners.

  1. Lets allies carry killstop3%rank 97 of 100
  2. Plays teamfightstop5%59% · top laners: 53%
  3. Absorbs damagetop9%1,507 · top laners: 970

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Frontline
  • Teamfight
  • Lets allies carry
  • CC

Like other top laners

  • Damage in lane

What it is not

  • Few duels
  • Little damage
  • No poke
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 28 in lane, 14 in mid game and 18 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

578-21 vs 599
789-79 vs 868
971-108 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Ornntop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 97% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 28 of 100 among top laners578 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 14 of 100 among top laners789 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 18 of 100 among top laners971 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 3 of 100 among top laners-773 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 3 of 100 among top laners-1,221 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 91 of 100 among top laners1,507 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 95 of 100 among top laners59% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 5 of 100 among top laners19% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 97 of 100 among top lanersrank 97 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 89 of 100 among top laners1.3 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 25 of 100 among top laners19% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Xin Zhao in amateur play: +9.7 pts over 115 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Camille47.4% · expected 41.8% · 76 g+5.6 ptSoloQ -1.0
Shen58.8% · expected 51.8% · 51 g+7.1 ptSoloQ -1.6
K'Sante54.3% · expected 50.0% · 70 g+4.3 ptSoloQ +2.2
Sion51.5% · expected 47.3% · 66 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +0.8
Renekton48.5% · expected 45.5% · 66 g+3.0 ptSoloQ +1.7
Junglegap to expected
Xin Zhao58.3% · expected 48.6% · 115 g+9.7 ptSoloQ -2.3
Cho'Gath58.5% · expected 45.6% · 41 g+12.9 ptSoloQ -0.2
Jarvan IV50.6% · expected 48.9% · 154 g+1.7 ptSoloQ -2.0
Sylas50.0% · expected 43.0% · 34 g+7.0 ptSoloQ +3.0
Skarner56.3% · expected 52.1% · 48 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +7.6
Midgap to expected
Viktor53.3% · expected 47.9% · 135 g+5.4 ptSoloQ -0.4
Anivia64.5% · expected 53.1% · 31 g+11.4 ptSoloQ -1.4
Syndra51.7% · expected 48.0% · 149 g+3.7 ptSoloQ +1.3
Ahri51.6% · expected 47.6% · 124 g+4.0 ptSoloQ +0.9
Lissandra57.6% · expected 47.1% · 33 g+10.4 ptSoloQ +2.5
ADCgap to expected
Kai'Sa60.2% · expected 51.3% · 88 g+9.0 ptSoloQ -0.1
Aphelios57.6% · expected 48.1% · 33 g+9.4 ptSoloQ +2.6
Yunara48.3% · expected 46.4% · 147 g+1.9 ptSoloQ +1.6
Zeri54.5% · expected 47.4% · 44 g+7.1 ptSoloQ -2.6
Ashe53.3% · expected 50.4% · 90 g+2.9 ptSoloQ -1.3
Supportgap to expected
Rell51.6% · expected 43.8% · 64 g+7.8 ptSoloQ +0.9
Seraphine53.4% · expected 49.9% · 103 g+3.5 ptSoloQ -1.2
Milio50.0% · expected 49.3% · 94 g+0.7 ptSoloQ -0.5
Alistar52.1% · expected 48.1% · 48 g+4.0 ptSoloQ -1.1
Nami53.5% · expected 50.5% · 43 g+3.0 ptSoloQ -1.6

With

Junglegap to expected
Shyvana59.1% · expected 48.4% · 44 g+10.7 ptSoloQ +2.7
Wukong51.9% · expected 48.3% · 231 g+3.7 ptSoloQ -1.2
Skarner54.8% · expected 44.5% · 31 g+10.3 ptSoloQ +9.5
Lee Sin60.9% · expected 54.5% · 46 g+6.3 ptSoloQ +1.0
Xin Zhao49.6% · expected 48.0% · 123 g+1.6 ptSoloQ +4.5
Midgap to expected
Syndra56.4% · expected 48.6% · 165 g+7.8 ptSoloQ +1.5
Hwei58.0% · expected 49.6% · 69 g+8.4 ptSoloQ -2.0
Viktor52.4% · expected 48.7% · 143 g+3.8 ptSoloQ +0.6
Orianna51.6% · expected 49.2% · 95 g+2.3 ptSoloQ +1.9
Xerath51.1% · expected 45.8% · 47 g+5.3 ptSoloQ -0.3
ADCgap to expected
Ezreal55.4% · expected 46.8% · 56 g+8.5 ptSoloQ +0.7
Jinx47.8% · expected 46.2% · 134 g+1.6 ptSoloQ -1.5
Yunara50.8% · expected 50.2% · 183 g+0.6 ptSoloQ +0.4
Sivir48.2% · expected 45.1% · 85 g+3.1 ptSoloQ 0.0
Caitlyn52.0% · expected 50.3% · 98 g+1.8 ptSoloQ -1.1
Supportgap to expected
Lulu51.5% · expected 45.3% · 196 g+6.3 ptSoloQ -1.2
Milio50.0% · expected 47.3% · 94 g+2.7 ptSoloQ +0.1
Braum49.0% · expected 47.6% · 102 g+1.4 ptSoloQ -1.9
Thresh53.7% · expected 49.3% · 54 g+4.4 ptSoloQ -0.6
Seraphine47.6% · expected 46.7% · 103 g+0.9 ptSoloQ +3.7

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top24 champions
  • Gwen83 games
    43.4%gap +0.2 ptsSoloQ: 53.5% · 555 g
  • Camille76 games
    47.4%gap +5.6 ptsSoloQ: 48.7% · 782 g
  • Ambessa72 games
    41.7%gap -5.8 ptsSoloQ: 53.7% · 711 g
  • K'Sante70 games
    54.3%gap +4.3 ptsSoloQ: 56.2% · 404 g
  • Renekton66 games
    48.5%gap +3.0 ptsSoloQ: 54.5% · 565 g
Jungle22 champions
  • Wukong194 games
    46.4%gap -1.9 ptsSoloQ: 50.2% · 825 g
  • Jarvan IV154 games
    50.6%gap +1.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.5% · 843 g
  • Xin Zhao115 games
    58.3%gap +9.7 ptsSoloQ: 49.2% · 248 g
  • Vi83 games
    44.6%gap -3.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 385 g
  • Sejuani62 games
    53.2%gap 0.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 225 g
Mid21 champions
  • Syndra149 games
    51.7%gap +3.7 ptsSoloQ: 51.4% · 1,085 g
  • Viktor135 games
    53.3%gap +5.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 927 g
  • Ahri124 games
    51.6%gap +4.0 ptsSoloQ: 50.6% · 1,225 g
  • Orianna97 games
    39.2%gap -8.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.5% · 487 g
  • Hwei66 games
    48.5%gap +1.5 ptsSoloQ: 49.2% · 459 g
ADC18 champions
  • Yunara147 games
    48.3%gap +1.9 ptsSoloQ: 52.5% · 1,740 g
  • Jinx106 games
    47.2%gap -3.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 1,365 g
  • Caitlyn103 games
    47.6%gap +1.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.8% · 1,231 g
  • Ashe90 games
    53.3%gap +2.9 ptsSoloQ: 50.1% · 507 g
  • Xayah89 games
    50.6%gap +2.7 ptsSoloQ: 48.5% · 639 g
Support17 champions
  • Lulu144 games
    50.7%gap -0.6 ptsSoloQ: 51.9% · 1,623 g
  • Nautilus132 games
    42.4%gap -2.7 ptsSoloQ: 52.1% · 1,146 g
  • Seraphine103 games
    53.4%gap +3.5 ptsSoloQ: 50.5% · 529 g
  • Karma97 games
    47.4%gap -2.7 ptsSoloQ: 51.2% · 916 g
  • Braum95 games
    38.9%gap -10.0 ptsSoloQ: 48.4% · 788 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Priority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+2.8%19,584 picks of 693,482ban 0.6% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments9.7%1,012 picks of 10,426ban 11.4% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro3.1%68 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

17.2% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 24.7%G1524 games of 2,122
  • 15.1%G2321 games of 2,122
  • 12.4%G3+86 games of 691
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 524 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.