Tournament presence · pick + ban
23.0%#20 of 173 champions
Pick
12.5%picked in 869 of 6,953 games
Ban
10.5%362 bans over 3,441 games, against 3.0% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid— 9 wins over 18 games
Median length—soloQ 27.2 min

Amateur: 6,991 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 357,498 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

One clear gap between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    10.5%
    SoloQ
    3.0%
    10.5% ban rate in amateur play over 2,100 games, against 3.0% in soloQ over 150,615 games.

Not enough games to judge: win rate, length, keystone, spells, and core.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Arcane Comet, then Malignance, Horizon Focus, and Cosmic Drive: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesArcane Comet59% · 577
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport58% · 575
Same in amateur play
Core (3 legendaries)14% · 25
14%of soloQ games
  1. Malignance
  2. Horizon Focus
  3. Cosmic Drive
Amateur: Malignance, Cryptbloom, Rabadon's Deathcap, gap not settled

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Plays teamfights first: more teamfights than 87% of mid laners.

  1. Plays teamfightstop14%60% · mid laners: 55%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • Teamfight

Like other mid laners

  • Absorbs damage
  • Crowd control (CC)

What it is not

  • Little map pressure
  • Few duels
  • Little damage
  • No poke
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Not measured: the fact is not validated by the draft review.

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 92% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
2.3takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 7 of 100 among mid laners-520 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 8 of 100 among mid laners-730 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 24 of 100 among mid laners2.3 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 31 of 100 among mid laners396 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 87 of 100 among mid laners60% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 12 of 100 among mid laners15% · median 23%
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 53 of 100 among mid laners0.7 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 9 of 100 among mid laners14% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

No positive gap in amateur play.

With

No positive gap in amateur play.

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

No pair measured in amateur play on this side.

05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Not enough series to settle it: raw counts only.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+0.1%941 picks of 714,990ban 3.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments0.2%16 picks of 10,426ban 10.5% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro0.0%0 picks of 2,224bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

16.1% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
Once picked, the series moves on to

Not enough series yet: published from 30.

Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.