Champion sheet · Top
Gnar
Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · NATournament presence · pick + ban
13.3%#56 of 173 champions
- Pick
- 7.4%picked in 215 of 2,915 games
- Ban
- 5.9%126 bans over 2,127 games, against 1.0% in soloQ
Win rate as Top48.6% between 43.0% and 54.2% over 212 gamesSoloQ 48.0%: no clear gap
Median length30 minsoloQ 28.1 min
Amateur: 2,915 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, NA. SoloQ Master+: 233,241 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.
At a glance
Four answers, each one opens its chapter.- What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.DraftLength
- How to play itLethal Tempo, then Trinity Force, Black Cleaver, and Sterak's Gage: the most played build in soloQ.
- In a compCrowd control (CC) first: more CC than 82% of top laners.CCDamagePokeSplit-push
- With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
- In draftPriority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.
What changes in tournaments?
3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.
- DraftPicked more often in amateur play
- Amateur
- 4.0%
- SoloQ
- 1.7%
- DraftBanned more often in amateur play
- Amateur
- 6.4%
- SoloQ
- 1.0%
- LengthLonger games in amateur play
- Amateur
- 30 min
- SoloQ
- 28.1 min
How to play it?
Lethal Tempo, then Trinity Force, Black Cleaver, and Sterak's Gage: the most played build in soloQ.
RunesLethal Tempo46% · 4,126Amateur: Fleet Footwork (48%), gap not settled
SpellsFlash + Teleport75% · 6,674Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQAmateur: 100% · 44 games
Core (3 legendaries)26% · 827
26%of soloQ games
- Trinity Force
- Black Cleaver
- Sterak's Gage
Same in amateur play
Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.
What does it bring to a comp?
Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 82% of top laners.
- Crowd control (CC)top18%1.2 · top laners: 0.8
- Team damagetop20%24% · top laners: 20%
Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners
What marks it
- CC
- Damage
- Poke
- Split-push
Like other top laners
- Damage in lane
- Damage in mid game
- Damage in late game
- Gold at 20 min
- Absorbs damage
- Plays teamfights
- Takes its kills in duels
- Lets allies carry kills
What it is not
Nothing below top laners.
Damage / min by phase · at equal gold
Rank 67 in lane, 60 in mid game and 35 in late game, out of 100 top laners.
632+33 vs 599
902+34 vs 868
1,016-64 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Gnartop laners
Gold vs. direct opponent
At 20 min, ahead of 75% of top laners against the direct opponent.
top laners
Where it stands among top laners · every measure
0 ← less · median · more → 100- Damage in lane · rank 67 of 100 among top laners632 · median 599
- Damage in mid game · rank 60 of 100 among top laners902 · median 868
- Damage in late game · rank 35 of 100 among top laners1,016 · median 1,079
- Gold at 15 min · rank 76 of 100 among top laners+286 · median +119
- Gold at 20 min · rank 75 of 100 among top laners+402 · median +100
- Absorbs damage · rank 46 of 100 among top laners888 · median 970
- Plays teamfights · rank 68 of 100 among top laners55% · median 53%
- Takes its kills in duels · rank 33 of 100 among top laners26% · median 28%
- Lets allies carry kills · rank 63 of 100 among top lanersrank 63 of 100
- Crowd control (CC) · rank 82 of 100 among top laners1.2 · median 0.8
- Team damage · rank 80 of 100 among top laners24% · median 20%
With whom, against whom?
No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
in
Best results
Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.
Against
Topgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Junglegap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Midgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
ADCgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Supportgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
With
Junglegap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Midgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
ADCgap to expected
No positive gap in amateur play.
Supportgap to expected
Lulu58.1% · expected 46.3% · 31 g+11.8 ptSoloQ -1.5
Matchups and allies
One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.
Sort by
Top11 champions
- Malphite25 games—SoloQ: 39.3% · 455 g
- K'Sante18 games—SoloQ: 53.3% · 240 g
- Aatrox16 games—SoloQ: 47.6% · 286 g
- Renekton13 games—SoloQ: 55.4% · 312 g
- Ornn12 games—SoloQ: 49.1% · 279 g
- Olaf11 games—SoloQ: 49.5% · 107 g
- Ambessa9 games—SoloQ: 54.3% · 247 g
- Gragas7 games—SoloQ: 47.1% · 121 g
- Malphite6 games—SoloQ: 39.3% · 455 g
- Sion6 games—SoloQ: 59.7% · 144 g
- Zaahen5 games—SoloQ: 52.8% · 142 g
Jungle14 champions
- Wukong32 games43.8%gap -4.7 ptsSoloQ: 45.2% · 345 g
- Xin Zhao18 games—SoloQ: 39.5% · 76 g
- Jarvan IV13 games—SoloQ: 54.4% · 305 g
- Vi12 games—SoloQ: 49.2% · 122 g
- Cho'Gath11 games—SoloQ: 45.4% · 260 g
- Lee Sin9 games—SoloQ: 53.2% · 410 g
- Trundle9 games—SoloQ: 45.7% · 46 g
- Kha'Zix7 games—SoloQ: 50.8% · 390 g
- Nocturne6 games—SoloQ: 49.6% · 135 g
- Pantheon6 games—SoloQ: 46.7% · 30 g
- Qiyana6 games—SoloQ: 51.3% · 308 g
- Naafiri5 games—SoloQ: 47.6% · 84 g
- Shyvana5 games—SoloQ: 43.5% · 230 g
- Zaahen5 games—SoloQ: 52.6% · 38 g
Mid13 champions
- Viktor29 games—SoloQ: 46.5% · 443 g
- Syndra24 games—SoloQ: 49.4% · 413 g
- Orianna20 games—SoloQ: 46.7% · 152 g
- Ahri15 games—SoloQ: 47.2% · 445 g
- Akali14 games—SoloQ: 48.4% · 225 g
- Hwei9 games—SoloQ: 48.9% · 180 g
- LeBlanc9 games—SoloQ: 46.2% · 234 g
- Sylas8 games—SoloQ: 43.7% · 286 g
- Aurora6 games—SoloQ: 51.5% · 134 g
- Cassiopeia6 games—SoloQ: 58.3% · 48 g
- Locke6 games—SoloQ: 47.8% · 347 g
- Ryze6 games—SoloQ: 53.6% · 97 g
- Yone5 games—SoloQ: 50.5% · 333 g
ADC15 champions
- Yunara22 games—SoloQ: 47.7% · 664 g
- Ezreal20 games—SoloQ: 53.8% · 429 g
- Jinx17 games—SoloQ: 46.4% · 692 g
- Caitlyn16 games—SoloQ: 47.5% · 463 g
- Jhin15 games—SoloQ: 49.0% · 825 g
- Kai'Sa11 games—SoloQ: 50.4% · 601 g
- Tristana11 games—SoloQ: 44.9% · 481 g
- Xayah11 games—SoloQ: 47.0% · 219 g
- Sivir10 games—SoloQ: 49.6% · 230 g
- Lucian9 games—SoloQ: 46.6% · 326 g
- Kalista8 games—SoloQ: 46.6% · 178 g
- Ashe7 games—SoloQ: 52.0% · 250 g
- Zeri6 games—SoloQ: 50.8% · 256 g
- Viktor5 games—SoloQ: 46.2% · 156 g
- Ziggs5 games—SoloQ: 53.9% · 89 g
Support15 champions
- Karma22 games—SoloQ: 48.2% · 303 g
- Nautilus18 games—SoloQ: 51.3% · 462 g
- Braum16 games—SoloQ: 46.8% · 250 g
- Lulu15 games—SoloQ: 46.3% · 505 g
- Rakan14 games—SoloQ: 47.8% · 207 g
- Milio13 games—SoloQ: 40.7% · 253 g
- Alistar10 games—SoloQ: 45.4% · 326 g
- Bard10 games—SoloQ: 52.4% · 227 g
- Leona10 games—SoloQ: 45.1% · 337 g
- Rell9 games—SoloQ: 44.0% · 241 g
- Renata Glasc9 games—SoloQ: 50.5% · 103 g
- Seraphine9 games—SoloQ: 53.0% · 270 g
- Neeko7 games—SoloQ: 62.5% · 64 g
- Thresh7 games—SoloQ: 44.5% · 676 g
- Sona5 games—SoloQ: 45.3% · 232 g
Ban it or pick it?
Priority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.
Pick rate as Top
Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ- SoloQ Master+1.7%7,988 picks of 466,476ban 1.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
- Amateur tournaments4.0%174 picks of 4,328ban 6.4% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
- Pro7.0%154 picks of 2,214bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20
Presence by patch
13.7% on 16.2116.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.
