Tournament presence · pick + ban
13.2%#56 of 173 champions
Pick
4.6%picked in 318 of 6,953 games
Ban
8.6%297 bans over 3,441 games, against 3.7% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid45.1% between 40.2% and 50.2% over 266 gamesSoloQ 49.8%: no clear gap
Median length28.9 minsoloQ 27.8 min

Amateur: 6,991 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 357,498 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    2.0%
    SoloQ
    1.3%
    2.0% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 1.3% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    9.0%
    SoloQ
    3.7%
    9.0% ban rate in amateur play over 2,100 games, against 3.7% in soloQ over 150,615 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.9 min
    SoloQ
    27.8 min
    Median of 28.9 min in amateur play, against 27.8 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Electrocute, then Rod of Ages, Malignance, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesElectrocute69% · 6,726
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport60% · 5,885
Same in amateur play
SkillsEnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 98% · 44 games
Core (3 legendaries)29% · 1,280
29%of soloQ games
  1. Rod of Ages
  2. Malignance
  3. Zhonya's Hourglass
Amateur: Rod of Ages, Malignance, Liandry's Torment (26%), gap not settled

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 97% of mid laners.

  1. Crowd control (CC)top3%1.6 · mid laners: 0.7
  2. Lets allies carry killstop12%rank 88 of 100

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • Lets allies carry
  • CC

Like other mid laners

  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Map pressure
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Team damage

What it is not

  • Few duels
  • No poke
  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 8 in lane, 16 in mid game and 35 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

467-61 vs 528
806-94 vs 899
1,146-33 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Aniviamid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 71% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
2.9takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 8 of 100 among mid laners467 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 16 of 100 among mid laners806 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 35 of 100 among mid laners1,146 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 33 of 100 among mid laners-135 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 29 of 100 among mid laners-186 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 34 of 100 among mid laners2.9 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 52 of 100 among mid laners497 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 57 of 100 among mid laners56% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 20 of 100 among mid laners18% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 88 of 100 among mid lanersrank 88 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 97 of 100 among mid laners1.6 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 50 of 100 among mid laners21% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Midgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected
Yunara45.5% · expected 43.1% · 33 g+2.3 ptSoloQ -0.8
Supportgap to expected
Nautilus42.4% · expected 42.0% · 33 g+0.5 ptSoloQ +1.6

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

ADCgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Supportgap to expected
Lulu54.3% · expected 42.1% · 35 g+12.1 ptSoloQ -0.1

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top16 champions
  • Ornn31 games
    35.5%gap -11.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.3% · 308 g
  • K'Sante16 games
    —SoloQ: 52.7% · 184 g
  • Sion15 games
    —SoloQ: 51.5% · 196 g
  • Ambessa13 games
    —SoloQ: 51.9% · 258 g
  • Renekton13 games
    —SoloQ: 50.6% · 267 g
Jungle16 champions
  • Wukong28 games
    —SoloQ: 47.2% · 324 g
  • Jarvan IV25 games
    —SoloQ: 53.5% · 402 g
  • Vi16 games
    —SoloQ: 53.4% · 163 g
  • Xin Zhao16 games
    —SoloQ: 55.9% · 111 g
  • Lee Sin14 games
    —SoloQ: 47.6% · 479 g
Mid15 champions
  • Syndra23 games
    —SoloQ: 47.4% · 559 g
  • Viktor23 games
    —SoloQ: 49.2% · 425 g
  • Ahri22 games
    —SoloQ: 46.4% · 608 g
  • Ryze22 games
    —SoloQ: 54.4% · 182 g
  • Xerath17 games
    —SoloQ: 47.3% · 205 g
ADC16 champions
  • Yunara33 games
    45.5%gap +2.3 ptsSoloQ: 48.8% · 768 g
  • Jinx24 games
    —SoloQ: 48.5% · 586 g
  • Tristana19 games
    —SoloQ: 46.9% · 586 g
  • Caitlyn18 games
    —SoloQ: 53.0% · 517 g
  • Xayah18 games
    —SoloQ: 45.9% · 244 g
Support15 champions
  • Nautilus33 games
    42.4%gap +0.5 ptsSoloQ: 52.3% · 564 g
  • Lulu24 games
    —SoloQ: 51.2% · 656 g
  • Braum19 games
    —SoloQ: 50.7% · 367 g
  • Milio19 games
    —SoloQ: 52.9% · 308 g
  • Seraphine19 games
    —SoloQ: 47.3% · 207 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Fallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+1.3%9,150 picks of 714,990ban 3.7% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments2.0%210 picks of 10,426ban 9.0% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro3.6%80 picks of 2,224bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

11.0% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 3.5%G174 games of 2,116
  • 3.9%G282 games of 2,116
  • 6.9%G3+47 games of 681
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 74 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.